This roundtable will follow the same lunch table format used at the Montreal meeting. The intention is simply to gather the interested participants around lunch tables to address the questions: What structural or administrative hurdles can we anticipate in the process of using our CDIO resources to meet Accreditation requirements? How will we meet these hurdles successfully and creatively? The roundtable size and duration will scale to match time and space available, possibly operating as up to three separate lunch tables with questions shaped by attendee special interests
This contribution is a strong plea for approaches in quality assessment and accreditation, which hon...
1. The purpose of the District Roundtable is to bring together, on an ongoing basis, partners groups...
Graduate student serving institutions can be as different as night and day, which can include everyt...
This is a proposal for a focused panel discussion session cum workshop on the topic of how instituti...
This session will provide an overview of the rationale and process for using the CDIO Standards to m...
This Advanced Workshop will focus on achieving successful processes at institutions that are impleme...
International audienceEducational program transformation plays a recurrent and key role in the futur...
The session went well. There were 25 people in attendance. We had 3 discussion topics: Shoul...
Since March 2015 the Faculty of Technology, Innovation and Society (TIS) of The Hague University of ...
This paper discusses our experience in the School of Electrical and Information Engineering at the U...
Previous research on the use of RoundTables in both classroom and professional group settings (Gabri...
This interactive session, focused on staff, asks participants to bring forward communication challen...
The round table discussions dealt with standardisation and its role in PACS and medical imaging, and...
Under the purview of Task 9.3, seven Roundtables were organised to gather focused expertise from out...
Objectives: The Research Data Management Roundtables are a collaborative effort to address the share...
This contribution is a strong plea for approaches in quality assessment and accreditation, which hon...
1. The purpose of the District Roundtable is to bring together, on an ongoing basis, partners groups...
Graduate student serving institutions can be as different as night and day, which can include everyt...
This is a proposal for a focused panel discussion session cum workshop on the topic of how instituti...
This session will provide an overview of the rationale and process for using the CDIO Standards to m...
This Advanced Workshop will focus on achieving successful processes at institutions that are impleme...
International audienceEducational program transformation plays a recurrent and key role in the futur...
The session went well. There were 25 people in attendance. We had 3 discussion topics: Shoul...
Since March 2015 the Faculty of Technology, Innovation and Society (TIS) of The Hague University of ...
This paper discusses our experience in the School of Electrical and Information Engineering at the U...
Previous research on the use of RoundTables in both classroom and professional group settings (Gabri...
This interactive session, focused on staff, asks participants to bring forward communication challen...
The round table discussions dealt with standardisation and its role in PACS and medical imaging, and...
Under the purview of Task 9.3, seven Roundtables were organised to gather focused expertise from out...
Objectives: The Research Data Management Roundtables are a collaborative effort to address the share...
This contribution is a strong plea for approaches in quality assessment and accreditation, which hon...
1. The purpose of the District Roundtable is to bring together, on an ongoing basis, partners groups...
Graduate student serving institutions can be as different as night and day, which can include everyt...