ДІЄПРИСЛІВНИК У ПРОЕКЦІЇ КАТЕГОРІЇ СТАНУ

Dijepryslivnyk (Participle) as morphologically specific class of words has always attracted linguists’ attention as its definitely hybrid nature causes ambiguity in differentiating the set of its grammatical features and, consequently, in defining the morphologic status of this word class. One of the most controversial is the problem of the Category of Voice if viewed as an inherited from the motivational verb grammatical feature; this problem being unresolved proves the topicality of this analysis. The aim is to study the possibility of a dijepryslivnyk to have one of the attributed features – the Category of Voice. The scientific research lets us aver that a dijepryslivnyk may derivationally correlate with the verbs of both Active and Passive Voice, but these forms prove only the possibility of a dijepryslivnyk to inherit reflexiveness/irreflexiveness from a verb; these forms don’t make a correlative Voice pair because they don’t have the grammatical meaning of Active or Passive Voice. This fact is proved in speech – a dijepryslivnyk can’t express its own subject-object relations as far as it names the action additional to the main one, and thus takes part in the expression of subject-object relations of the basic predicate. So, the Category of Voice is not inherited from the motivational verb by a dijepryslivnyk