We consider the uniform model of computation over any structure with two constants. For several structures, we construct oracles which imply that the relativized versions of P and NP are equal or are not equal. We construct universal oracles which imply the equality of the relativized versions of P and NP and we show that we lose the possibility to define these oracles recursively if we try to compress their elements to tuples of fixed length. Moreover we give new oracles for the BSS model in order to separate the classes P and NP relative to these oracles
AbstractWe consider under the assumption P ≠ NP questions concerning the structure of the lattice of...
AbstractA new notion of an oracle machine being ‘helped’ by an oracle set is introduced. It is requi...
AbstractComplexity classes are usually defined by referring to computation models and by putting sui...
AbstractWe consider the uniform model of computation over arbitrary structures with two constants. F...
AbstractThis paper introduces a technique of relativizing already relativized computations and gives...
We consider the uniform BSS model of computation where the machines can perform additions, multiplic...
This note clarifies which oracles separate NP from P and which do not. In essence, we are changing ...
AbstractThe prototypical results of relativized complexity theory are the theorems of Baker, Gill, a...
AbstractWhether or not P is properly included in NP is currently one of the most important open prob...
The operators min?, max?, and #? translate classes of the polynomial-time hierarchy to function clas...
AbstractWe investigate some possible inclusion relations between complexity classes in relativized v...
The possible relationships between NP and EXPAk = ∪∞c = 0 DTIME (2cnk) relative to oracles are exami...
AbstractThe principal result of this paper is a “positive relativization” of the open question “P = ...
We consider the uniform BSS model of computation where the machines can perform additions, multiplic...
Abstract. Existing definitions of the relativizations of NC 1, L and NL do not preserve the inclusio...
AbstractWe consider under the assumption P ≠ NP questions concerning the structure of the lattice of...
AbstractA new notion of an oracle machine being ‘helped’ by an oracle set is introduced. It is requi...
AbstractComplexity classes are usually defined by referring to computation models and by putting sui...
AbstractWe consider the uniform model of computation over arbitrary structures with two constants. F...
AbstractThis paper introduces a technique of relativizing already relativized computations and gives...
We consider the uniform BSS model of computation where the machines can perform additions, multiplic...
This note clarifies which oracles separate NP from P and which do not. In essence, we are changing ...
AbstractThe prototypical results of relativized complexity theory are the theorems of Baker, Gill, a...
AbstractWhether or not P is properly included in NP is currently one of the most important open prob...
The operators min?, max?, and #? translate classes of the polynomial-time hierarchy to function clas...
AbstractWe investigate some possible inclusion relations between complexity classes in relativized v...
The possible relationships between NP and EXPAk = ∪∞c = 0 DTIME (2cnk) relative to oracles are exami...
AbstractThe principal result of this paper is a “positive relativization” of the open question “P = ...
We consider the uniform BSS model of computation where the machines can perform additions, multiplic...
Abstract. Existing definitions of the relativizations of NC 1, L and NL do not preserve the inclusio...
AbstractWe consider under the assumption P ≠ NP questions concerning the structure of the lattice of...
AbstractA new notion of an oracle machine being ‘helped’ by an oracle set is introduced. It is requi...
AbstractComplexity classes are usually defined by referring to computation models and by putting sui...