Internal Dynamics of India's Foreign Policy towards Nepal

Although monarchy, religion, and language all retained their key roles in state creation under the new system, the rulers were unable to put multiculturalism into effect. As a result, identity politics have been given a platform thanks to a shift in emphasis from changing systems to changing actors inside them. Because the Maoist movement recognized the identity-politics objectives of many castes, ethnicities, languages, sexes, etc., the violent fight of the Maoists was effective. As a result of the Maoists' desire for a peaceful conclusion to their fight and the south's recognition of the futility of multi-party players, Nepal entered a republican era and signed the twelve-point accord. Furthermore, the demands of excluded and disadvantaged groups rendered the state-building process ineffective throughout this period of transitional democracy. People's hopes and dreams were not quickly realized due to a lack of ideologically-oriented leaders and political parties. The administration was too ineffective to fulfill the people's hopes and dreams. From the start, internal actors have politicized people's sociopolitical difficulties and laid blame at each other's feet. Peace and political stability in Nepal have room to be affected by events outside the country