The CDIO Initiative celebrates its 10th anniversary by proposing today a mature integrated framework to reform or continuously improve engineering programs. It is now time to prepare the next decade in sustaining the evolution of its standards and ensuring their interoperability with other frameworks. Considering models and stakeholders' views, as well as taking inspiration from an enterprise architecture approach, offers several challenges for such. Derived from an analysis of the CDIO standards from a structural, behavioural/business and informational perspectives, this paper reveals some semantic relationships among some of these concepts which also shed light on dependencies among stakeholders' models
Today's graduate engineers not only have to be work-ready, but they have to be world-ready - ready t...
While the CDIO standards and syllabus give a strong framework upon which to develop good quality eng...
An effort to update the CDIO Standards from version 2.1 to 3.0 was started in 2017 (Malmqvist et al....
On the one hand, no one international model for quality assurance evaluation of higher education has...
International audienceEducational program transformation plays a recurrent and key role in the futur...
International audienceOn the one hand, no one international model for quality assurance evaluation o...
Today's graduate engineers not only have to be work-ready, but they have to be world-ready - ready t...
The topic of this paper is the CDIO Standards, specifically the formulation of CDIO Standards versio...
The paper summarizes the experiences of working for a decade to promote the transition of courses to...
Since March 2015 the Faculty of Technology, Innovation and Society (TIS) of The Hague University of ...
This contribution describes a year-long educational development project funded by the Kamprad Founda...
The paper describes the results of a recent project entitled “DOCET - EQF CDIO Correspondence Model ...
This paper describes the motivation, the current state and the further actions of an improvement pro...
The CDIO Initiative is going through a process of reconsidering and updating the CDIO approach for e...
BACKGROUND: CDIO – Conceive, Design Implement and Operate has become a hot topic in curriculum desig...
Today's graduate engineers not only have to be work-ready, but they have to be world-ready - ready t...
While the CDIO standards and syllabus give a strong framework upon which to develop good quality eng...
An effort to update the CDIO Standards from version 2.1 to 3.0 was started in 2017 (Malmqvist et al....
On the one hand, no one international model for quality assurance evaluation of higher education has...
International audienceEducational program transformation plays a recurrent and key role in the futur...
International audienceOn the one hand, no one international model for quality assurance evaluation o...
Today's graduate engineers not only have to be work-ready, but they have to be world-ready - ready t...
The topic of this paper is the CDIO Standards, specifically the formulation of CDIO Standards versio...
The paper summarizes the experiences of working for a decade to promote the transition of courses to...
Since March 2015 the Faculty of Technology, Innovation and Society (TIS) of The Hague University of ...
This contribution describes a year-long educational development project funded by the Kamprad Founda...
The paper describes the results of a recent project entitled “DOCET - EQF CDIO Correspondence Model ...
This paper describes the motivation, the current state and the further actions of an improvement pro...
The CDIO Initiative is going through a process of reconsidering and updating the CDIO approach for e...
BACKGROUND: CDIO – Conceive, Design Implement and Operate has become a hot topic in curriculum desig...
Today's graduate engineers not only have to be work-ready, but they have to be world-ready - ready t...
While the CDIO standards and syllabus give a strong framework upon which to develop good quality eng...
An effort to update the CDIO Standards from version 2.1 to 3.0 was started in 2017 (Malmqvist et al....