FIG. 13. — Royacanthops confusa Schwarz & Moulin, n. gen., n. sp., male abdomen apices: A, holotype terminalia; B, paratype terminalia; C, holotype genitalia, ventral view; D, paratype genitalia, ventral view. Scale bars: 1 mm.Published as part of Moulin, Nicolas & Schwarz, Christian J., 2023, Two new genera of Acanthopidae (Mantodea) from the Amazon region, with description of a new species, pp. 137-161 in Zoosystema 45 (5) on page 151, DOI: 10.5252/zoosystema2023v45a5, http://zenodo.org/record/772880
Malgré des travaux récents sur la systématique des Acanthopinae Burmeister, 1838, la situation de de...
FIGURE 4. Colour gradation in the forewing spot of male specimens of Metaphotina austri sp. n. (A) M...
FIGURES 37–44. Acrogonia youngi sp. nov. 37, body, male holotype (NHM), dorsal view (total length 11...
FIG. 6. — Royacanthops confusa Schwarz & Moulin, n. gen., n. sp., male holotype ex. SMNK-Mant 00005:...
FIG. 12. — Royacanthops confusa Schwarz & Moulin, n. gen., n. sp., female forewing, reconstructed an...
FIG. 5. — Royacanthops soukana (Roy, 2002) n. comb. female holotype MNHN-EP-EP2424, dorsal view. Sca...
Moulin, Nicolas, Schwarz, Christian J. (2023): Two new genera of Acanthopidae (Mantodea) from the Am...
FIG. 20. — Humid forest of low altitude at Montagne des Chevaux, locality of the male of Royacanthop...
FIGURES 5–9. Metacanthops amazonica n. comb. (holotype of Acanthops amazonica): 5, male, dorsal habi...
FIGURE 7. Variation in male genitalia in specimens of Metaphotina austri sp. n. in dorsal view (A–B)...
FIGURES 13–22. Summary of key morphological features to distinguish Acanthops and Metilia from Metac...
FIGURE 1. A–F, Decimiana gaucha sp. nov. (holotype ♂). A, dorsal habitus (scale 2 mm) and label; B, ...
FIGURES 65–68. Acanthops erosula Stål, 1877. 65. Male in dorsal view. 66. Same, ventral view. 67. Fe...
FIGURES 69–70. Acanthops royi Lombardo & Ippolito, 2004. 69. Male in dorsal view. 70. Same, ventral ...
FIGURE 1. Paramantoida amazonica n. sp. ♂ holotype from Brazilian Amazon (INPA).Published as part of...
Malgré des travaux récents sur la systématique des Acanthopinae Burmeister, 1838, la situation de de...
FIGURE 4. Colour gradation in the forewing spot of male specimens of Metaphotina austri sp. n. (A) M...
FIGURES 37–44. Acrogonia youngi sp. nov. 37, body, male holotype (NHM), dorsal view (total length 11...
FIG. 6. — Royacanthops confusa Schwarz & Moulin, n. gen., n. sp., male holotype ex. SMNK-Mant 00005:...
FIG. 12. — Royacanthops confusa Schwarz & Moulin, n. gen., n. sp., female forewing, reconstructed an...
FIG. 5. — Royacanthops soukana (Roy, 2002) n. comb. female holotype MNHN-EP-EP2424, dorsal view. Sca...
Moulin, Nicolas, Schwarz, Christian J. (2023): Two new genera of Acanthopidae (Mantodea) from the Am...
FIG. 20. — Humid forest of low altitude at Montagne des Chevaux, locality of the male of Royacanthop...
FIGURES 5–9. Metacanthops amazonica n. comb. (holotype of Acanthops amazonica): 5, male, dorsal habi...
FIGURE 7. Variation in male genitalia in specimens of Metaphotina austri sp. n. in dorsal view (A–B)...
FIGURES 13–22. Summary of key morphological features to distinguish Acanthops and Metilia from Metac...
FIGURE 1. A–F, Decimiana gaucha sp. nov. (holotype ♂). A, dorsal habitus (scale 2 mm) and label; B, ...
FIGURES 65–68. Acanthops erosula Stål, 1877. 65. Male in dorsal view. 66. Same, ventral view. 67. Fe...
FIGURES 69–70. Acanthops royi Lombardo & Ippolito, 2004. 69. Male in dorsal view. 70. Same, ventral ...
FIGURE 1. Paramantoida amazonica n. sp. ♂ holotype from Brazilian Amazon (INPA).Published as part of...
Malgré des travaux récents sur la systématique des Acanthopinae Burmeister, 1838, la situation de de...
FIGURE 4. Colour gradation in the forewing spot of male specimens of Metaphotina austri sp. n. (A) M...
FIGURES 37–44. Acrogonia youngi sp. nov. 37, body, male holotype (NHM), dorsal view (total length 11...