FIGURE 3. Basic types of lamellodiscs. A. Intermediate lamellae fused at midline. B. Intermediate lamellae superficially incomplete, partially fused at midline. C. Intermediate lamellae incomplete, free at midline.Published as part of Domingues, Marcus V. & Boeger, Walter A., 2008, Phylogeny and revision of Diplectanidae Monticelli, 1903 (Platyhelminthes: Monogenoidea), pp. 1-40 in Zootaxa 1698 on page 9, DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.18075
Figure 3. Eutrichodesmus basalis sp. n., ♀ paratype; A, enlarged paraterga with ozopores, lateral vi...
FIGURE 3. Protoplanella simplex Reisinger, 1924. Habitus based on observations on live animals and s...
FIGURE 3. Thelepus megalabiatum n. sp. (Holotype, MZUSP 3017), (A–B, D–E). Anterior end, ventral, do...
FIGURE 3. Basic types of lamellodiscs. A. Intermediate lamellae fused at midline. B. Intermediate la...
FIGURE 2. Basic types of squamodiscs. A. Anterior rows of the rodlet with open rings. B. Anterior ro...
FIGURE 4. Basic types of ventral anchors. A. Ventral anchor with developed superficial root. B. Vent...
FIGURE 5. Basic types of dorsal anchors. A. Dorsal anchor with developed superficial root. B. Dorsal...
FIGURE 1. Summary of the proposed phylogenetic hypotheses of Diplectanidae. A. Hypothesis for genera...
FIGURE 7. Phylogenetic hypothesis based on morphologic data (36 characters) for genera of Diplectani...
Domingues, Marcus V., Boeger, Walter A. (2008): Phylogeny and revision of Diplectanidae Monticelli, ...
FIGURE 6. Detail of the some reproductive structures of Diplectanum dollfusi Oliver, 1980. ACO = acc...
Figure 3. (A,C,D) Thalassisobates emesesensis sp. nov., (B) Thalassisobates littoralis. (A, B) Anter...
Figure 3. Marionfyfea adventor sp. nov. Holotype (NHMUK 2015.4.21.1). (a) and (b) Selected sections ...
FIGURE 2. Pseudodalyellia alabamensis n. gen. n. sp. (A) Internal organisation from a live animal. (...
FIGURE 3. Chaetoleptophyllum flexum Golovatch, 1979, male from near Tkibuli, Georgia. A: antenna, la...
Figure 3. Eutrichodesmus basalis sp. n., ♀ paratype; A, enlarged paraterga with ozopores, lateral vi...
FIGURE 3. Protoplanella simplex Reisinger, 1924. Habitus based on observations on live animals and s...
FIGURE 3. Thelepus megalabiatum n. sp. (Holotype, MZUSP 3017), (A–B, D–E). Anterior end, ventral, do...
FIGURE 3. Basic types of lamellodiscs. A. Intermediate lamellae fused at midline. B. Intermediate la...
FIGURE 2. Basic types of squamodiscs. A. Anterior rows of the rodlet with open rings. B. Anterior ro...
FIGURE 4. Basic types of ventral anchors. A. Ventral anchor with developed superficial root. B. Vent...
FIGURE 5. Basic types of dorsal anchors. A. Dorsal anchor with developed superficial root. B. Dorsal...
FIGURE 1. Summary of the proposed phylogenetic hypotheses of Diplectanidae. A. Hypothesis for genera...
FIGURE 7. Phylogenetic hypothesis based on morphologic data (36 characters) for genera of Diplectani...
Domingues, Marcus V., Boeger, Walter A. (2008): Phylogeny and revision of Diplectanidae Monticelli, ...
FIGURE 6. Detail of the some reproductive structures of Diplectanum dollfusi Oliver, 1980. ACO = acc...
Figure 3. (A,C,D) Thalassisobates emesesensis sp. nov., (B) Thalassisobates littoralis. (A, B) Anter...
Figure 3. Marionfyfea adventor sp. nov. Holotype (NHMUK 2015.4.21.1). (a) and (b) Selected sections ...
FIGURE 2. Pseudodalyellia alabamensis n. gen. n. sp. (A) Internal organisation from a live animal. (...
FIGURE 3. Chaetoleptophyllum flexum Golovatch, 1979, male from near Tkibuli, Georgia. A: antenna, la...
Figure 3. Eutrichodesmus basalis sp. n., ♀ paratype; A, enlarged paraterga with ozopores, lateral vi...
FIGURE 3. Protoplanella simplex Reisinger, 1924. Habitus based on observations on live animals and s...
FIGURE 3. Thelepus megalabiatum n. sp. (Holotype, MZUSP 3017), (A–B, D–E). Anterior end, ventral, do...