In this paper Lucas suggests that many of his critics have not read carefully neither his exposition nor Penrose’s one, so they seek to refute arguments they never proposed. Therefore he offers a brief history of the Gödelian argument put forward by Gödel, Penrose and Lucas itself: Gödel argued indeed that either mathematics is incompletable – that is axioms can never be comprised in a finite rule and so human mind surpasses the power of any finite machine – or there exist absolutely unsolvable diophantine problems, and he suggest that the second disjunct is untenable; on the other side, Penrose proposed an argument similar to Lucas’ one but making use of Turing’s theorem. Finally Lucas exposes again his argument and considers some of the m...
Remarks on the Foundations of Mathematics were dismissed by early commentators, such as Kreisel, And...
This article aims to examine Koellner’s reconstruction of Penrose’s second argument a reconstructi...
imbroglio about the possible inclusion of Gödel’s original work on incompleteness in the book, Gödel...
In this paper Lucas suggests that many of his critics have not read carefully neither his exposition...
Storrs McCall continues the tradition of Lucas and Penrose in an attempt to refute mechanism by appe...
In this paper Lucas comes back to Gödelian argument against Mecanism to clarify some points. First o...
AbstractGödel's theorem is consistent with the computationalist hypothesis. Roger Penrose, however, ...
Lucas-Penrose type arguments have been the focus of many papers in the literature. In the present pa...
In the first part of the introduction, I explain the origin of Lucas\u2019 G\uf6delian Argument, pro...
In this article, Lucas maintains the falseness of Mechanism - the attempt to explain minds as machin...
Certain selected issues around the Gödelian anti-mechanist arguments which have received less attent...
Gödel's theorem is consistent with the computationalist hypothesis. Roger Penrose, however, cla...
Can the human mind be properly described in mechanical terms? It is in order to demonstrate that it ...
The author, whose untimely passing in April 2006 was a great loss to the logic community, used this ...
The articles in this issue can be divided into three groups. Krajewski’s article, Yong Cheng’s contr...
Remarks on the Foundations of Mathematics were dismissed by early commentators, such as Kreisel, And...
This article aims to examine Koellner’s reconstruction of Penrose’s second argument a reconstructi...
imbroglio about the possible inclusion of Gödel’s original work on incompleteness in the book, Gödel...
In this paper Lucas suggests that many of his critics have not read carefully neither his exposition...
Storrs McCall continues the tradition of Lucas and Penrose in an attempt to refute mechanism by appe...
In this paper Lucas comes back to Gödelian argument against Mecanism to clarify some points. First o...
AbstractGödel's theorem is consistent with the computationalist hypothesis. Roger Penrose, however, ...
Lucas-Penrose type arguments have been the focus of many papers in the literature. In the present pa...
In the first part of the introduction, I explain the origin of Lucas\u2019 G\uf6delian Argument, pro...
In this article, Lucas maintains the falseness of Mechanism - the attempt to explain minds as machin...
Certain selected issues around the Gödelian anti-mechanist arguments which have received less attent...
Gödel's theorem is consistent with the computationalist hypothesis. Roger Penrose, however, cla...
Can the human mind be properly described in mechanical terms? It is in order to demonstrate that it ...
The author, whose untimely passing in April 2006 was a great loss to the logic community, used this ...
The articles in this issue can be divided into three groups. Krajewski’s article, Yong Cheng’s contr...
Remarks on the Foundations of Mathematics were dismissed by early commentators, such as Kreisel, And...
This article aims to examine Koellner’s reconstruction of Penrose’s second argument a reconstructi...
imbroglio about the possible inclusion of Gödel’s original work on incompleteness in the book, Gödel...