The purpose of this study is to suggest a socio-historical frame of reference within which 2 Thessalonians may have communicated meaningfully with its intended readers. The question of the historical background of 2 Thessalonians is discussed within the context of the question of the letter's authorship. First, the article focuses on the traditional view that Paul was the author and that the delayed parousia was the issue he addressed. Second, the article aims to argue an alternative view: 2 Thessalonians is reread as a pseudepigraph and it is an open question whether the delayed parousia was really the problem the author addressed
<strong>‘The day of the Lord is already here’ (2 Thess 2:2b) – A key problem to the understand...
This thesis contributes to the debate regarding the frequency with which letters with co-senders occ...
In the period of last two or three decades interpretation of the Letter to Philemon has undergone si...
The same arguments for the authorship of 1 Thessalonians apply here, though 2 Thessalonians is much ...
The relation between 1 Thessalonians and 2 Thessalonians is a disputed question. Many scholars argue...
Purpose of 1 and 2 Thessalonians. More similarities than differences This article examines the pur...
This thesis examines the composition of 2 Thessalonians 2 and focuses specifically on the relationsh...
Evidence for Pauline authorship is overwhelming, both internally and externally. It is filled with s...
The text and transmission of 2 Thessalonians has not received serious scholarly attention in more th...
2 Timothy is often referred to as pseudepigraphic testament of Paul. A minority considers it an auth...
<p><strong>The relationship between Colossians and Ephesians as a synoptic problem. <...
This article investigated the presentation of the future existence of the believers in Paul’s second...
The Letter to the Ephesians is considered by many to be one of the most poignant and moving epistles...
Today the majority of critical scholars regard Paul’s Epistle to the Ephesians to be a pseudepigraph...
Recent scholarship has argued that Simon Peter is not the author of 1 Peter, whilst maintaining that...
<strong>‘The day of the Lord is already here’ (2 Thess 2:2b) – A key problem to the understand...
This thesis contributes to the debate regarding the frequency with which letters with co-senders occ...
In the period of last two or three decades interpretation of the Letter to Philemon has undergone si...
The same arguments for the authorship of 1 Thessalonians apply here, though 2 Thessalonians is much ...
The relation between 1 Thessalonians and 2 Thessalonians is a disputed question. Many scholars argue...
Purpose of 1 and 2 Thessalonians. More similarities than differences This article examines the pur...
This thesis examines the composition of 2 Thessalonians 2 and focuses specifically on the relationsh...
Evidence for Pauline authorship is overwhelming, both internally and externally. It is filled with s...
The text and transmission of 2 Thessalonians has not received serious scholarly attention in more th...
2 Timothy is often referred to as pseudepigraphic testament of Paul. A minority considers it an auth...
<p><strong>The relationship between Colossians and Ephesians as a synoptic problem. <...
This article investigated the presentation of the future existence of the believers in Paul’s second...
The Letter to the Ephesians is considered by many to be one of the most poignant and moving epistles...
Today the majority of critical scholars regard Paul’s Epistle to the Ephesians to be a pseudepigraph...
Recent scholarship has argued that Simon Peter is not the author of 1 Peter, whilst maintaining that...
<strong>‘The day of the Lord is already here’ (2 Thess 2:2b) – A key problem to the understand...
This thesis contributes to the debate regarding the frequency with which letters with co-senders occ...
In the period of last two or three decades interpretation of the Letter to Philemon has undergone si...