Figure S1. Linear regressions comparing mean rank category scores for individual state/territory science standards. The adjusted R2 and slope of each regression is shown at the top of each plot. Shown are the regression for mean Term Presence score vs. mean Human Interactions score (A), mean Term Presence score vs. mean Level of Urgency score (B), and mean Human Interactions score vs. mean Level of Urgency score (C). Each point represents an individual state or territory science standard. All states and territories that have adopted NGSS in full are represented as a single data point and shown in green
Bibliography: pages 83-106.In 1984 Bybee used 262 science educators from 41 countries to develop an ...
<p>Comparison of geographical structure of populations by assessments with AMOVA.</p
The poster looks at shaping the earth\u27s surface and the ecosystems of the world.https://pdxschola...
Figure S4. Distribution of ranks for each dimension across all individual state and territory standa...
Figure S2. Linear regression of mean scores against standard length measured as total word count per...
Figure S3. Interrater agreement across all standards, terms, and dimensions. Shown are the distribut...
Comparison of overall mean scores when retrospectively labelling individual sources of Environmental...
<p>Panel A provides the normalized scores for human dependence on shoreline protection, Panel B show...
Educational reform efforts are currently at the top of the nation's agenda. Policymakers are he...
<p>A. Correlation among geographic (latitude, evapotranspiration, nation area size), climate (mean t...
Descriptive statistics of participants’ age and parents’ education level by gender and state.</p
A box plot representation of the coefficients obtained through Geographically Weighted Regression (G...
<p>Grey bars report results from country-specific OLS regressions for model M2a (self-reported healt...
Global Learning and Observations to Benefit the Environment (GLOBE) is a K- 12 international science...
<p>State-level star ratings scores adjusted by geography location and population density (Mean and S...
Bibliography: pages 83-106.In 1984 Bybee used 262 science educators from 41 countries to develop an ...
<p>Comparison of geographical structure of populations by assessments with AMOVA.</p
The poster looks at shaping the earth\u27s surface and the ecosystems of the world.https://pdxschola...
Figure S4. Distribution of ranks for each dimension across all individual state and territory standa...
Figure S2. Linear regression of mean scores against standard length measured as total word count per...
Figure S3. Interrater agreement across all standards, terms, and dimensions. Shown are the distribut...
Comparison of overall mean scores when retrospectively labelling individual sources of Environmental...
<p>Panel A provides the normalized scores for human dependence on shoreline protection, Panel B show...
Educational reform efforts are currently at the top of the nation's agenda. Policymakers are he...
<p>A. Correlation among geographic (latitude, evapotranspiration, nation area size), climate (mean t...
Descriptive statistics of participants’ age and parents’ education level by gender and state.</p
A box plot representation of the coefficients obtained through Geographically Weighted Regression (G...
<p>Grey bars report results from country-specific OLS regressions for model M2a (self-reported healt...
Global Learning and Observations to Benefit the Environment (GLOBE) is a K- 12 international science...
<p>State-level star ratings scores adjusted by geography location and population density (Mean and S...
Bibliography: pages 83-106.In 1984 Bybee used 262 science educators from 41 countries to develop an ...
<p>Comparison of geographical structure of populations by assessments with AMOVA.</p
The poster looks at shaping the earth\u27s surface and the ecosystems of the world.https://pdxschola...