Assessing the Potential Revenue and Distributional Effects of Property Taxation in Kenya : An Analysis of Property and Income Distribution among Kenyan Households

Taxation is a critical tool for development, as well-designed tax systems can generate greater revenues to fund public goods and investments that drive productivity. However, lower-income countries often raise only a small percentage of their gross domestic product (GDP) in taxes compared to higher-income countries. The gap in revenue is particularly striking for property taxes. This thesis begins with a literature review on taxation in developing countries and property taxation in general, emphasizing the challenges of property taxation in developing countries. It then provides relevant background information on Kenya, discussing inequality, general taxation, and property taxation. Using survey data from the Kenya Integrated Household Budget Survey 2015-2016, the thesis then investigates the distribution of property value and income among Kenyan households. It then explores the potential revenue and distributional effects of two property taxation models while also considering potential revenue loss from taxing households with insufficient income or savings. The trends between household income and property value indicate that higher annual incomes correlate with higher property values and vice versa. However, low-income individuals also owned higher-value properties, leading to liquidity problems. A 2% linear property tax rate model revealed a heavy tax burden on lower-income households and an overall revenue potential of 2.38% of total survey income or 0.94% of 2016 GDP. The study observed significant decreases in revenue potential when adjusting revenue to account for the ability to pay. This research also modeled a property tax rate payable only upon reaching a specific income threshold to address liquidity problems. In this model, the tax burden shifted to higher-income households with an overall potential tax revenue of 1.91% of total survey income or 0.76% of GDP. In conclusion, the observed trends, such as the high prevalence of inability to pay, relatively low revenue potential, and the administrative effort required for property taxation, suggest that reforming property taxation may not be the most practical approach for increasing revenue in Kenya