In Ethiopian Orthodox Tewahedo Church of Canada St. Mary Cathedral v. Aga, the Supreme Court of Canada undertook to grapple with the question of whether, when, and to what extent courts should get involved in the internal decisions of religious groups where there are allegations of procedural unfairness. This paper approaches Aga with an interest in the issue of state regulation of religion through law. The paper (1) reviews and assesses the Court\u27s judgment; (2) summarizes and analyzes the 12 intervener submissions, many of which were made by religious groups likely to be affected by the Court\u27s eventual judgment; and (3) outlines some conclusions that interpret Aga in light of the intervener submissions and the Court\u27s lead prece...
This paper examines one narrow question which is raised tangentially by virtue of the Constitution A...
While two recent Supreme Court cases on religious freedom appear sharply at odds, in one material re...
Published in cooperation with the American Bar Association Section of Dispute Resolutio
Judicial consideration of religious disputes prompt concerns that the legal system may delve into is...
In recent years, there have been a number of moral panics in Western societies about the existence o...
For nearly forty years, the courts have barred a variety of lawsuits by clergy against their religio...
In this Article, Professor Kent Greenawalt explores how civil courts can constitutionally resolve co...
At first glance, religious courts, especially Sharia courts, seem incompatible with secular, democra...
The Supreme Court\u27s recent decision in Hosanna-Tabor Evangelical Lutheran Church and School v. EE...
Although the U.S. Constitution protects the rights of religious institutions, it confers no general ...
In its 2012 decision in Hosanna-Tabor Evangelical Lutheran Church and School v. EEOC, the Supreme Co...
My dissertation explores the nature, source and scope of the rights of religious institutions in the...
It is the purpose of this comment to set forth the several principles applied by courts in determini...
In Hosanna-Tabor Church and School v. EEOC, the Supreme Court recognized for the first time that the...
In its 2012 decision in Hosanna-Tabor Evangelical Church & Sch. V. EEOC, the Supreme Court held ...
This paper examines one narrow question which is raised tangentially by virtue of the Constitution A...
While two recent Supreme Court cases on religious freedom appear sharply at odds, in one material re...
Published in cooperation with the American Bar Association Section of Dispute Resolutio
Judicial consideration of religious disputes prompt concerns that the legal system may delve into is...
In recent years, there have been a number of moral panics in Western societies about the existence o...
For nearly forty years, the courts have barred a variety of lawsuits by clergy against their religio...
In this Article, Professor Kent Greenawalt explores how civil courts can constitutionally resolve co...
At first glance, religious courts, especially Sharia courts, seem incompatible with secular, democra...
The Supreme Court\u27s recent decision in Hosanna-Tabor Evangelical Lutheran Church and School v. EE...
Although the U.S. Constitution protects the rights of religious institutions, it confers no general ...
In its 2012 decision in Hosanna-Tabor Evangelical Lutheran Church and School v. EEOC, the Supreme Co...
My dissertation explores the nature, source and scope of the rights of religious institutions in the...
It is the purpose of this comment to set forth the several principles applied by courts in determini...
In Hosanna-Tabor Church and School v. EEOC, the Supreme Court recognized for the first time that the...
In its 2012 decision in Hosanna-Tabor Evangelical Church & Sch. V. EEOC, the Supreme Court held ...
This paper examines one narrow question which is raised tangentially by virtue of the Constitution A...
While two recent Supreme Court cases on religious freedom appear sharply at odds, in one material re...
Published in cooperation with the American Bar Association Section of Dispute Resolutio