Five-year outcomes with PCI guided by fractional flow reserve

  • Xaplanteris, P.
  • Fournier, S.
  • Pijls, N.H.J.
  • Fearon, W. F.
  • Barbato, E.
  • Tonino, P.A.L.
  • Engstrøm, T.
  • Kääb, S.
  • Dambrink, J. H.
  • Rioufol, G.
  • Toth, G. G.
  • Piroth, Z.
  • Witt, N.
  • Fröbert, O.
  • Kala, P.
  • Linke, A.
  • Jagic, N.
  • Mates, M.
  • Mavromatis, K.
  • Samady, H.
  • Irimpen, A.
  • Oldroyd, K.
  • Campo, G.
  • Rothenbühler, M.
  • Jüni, P.
  • De Bruyne, B.
Open PDF
Publication date
July 2018
Language
English

Abstract

BACKGROUND We hypothesized that fractional flow reserve (FFR)-guided percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) would be superior to medical therapy as initial treatment in patients with stable coronary artery disease. METHODS Among 1220 patients with angiographically significant stenoses, those in whom at least one stenosis was hemodynamically significant (FFR, ≤0.80) were randomly assigned to FFR-guided PCI plus medical therapy or to medical therapy alone. Patients in whom all stenoses had an FFR of more than 0.80 received medical therapy and were entered into a registry. The primary end point was a composite of death, myocardial infarction, or urgent revascularization. RESULTS A total of 888 patients underwent randomization (447 patients i...

Extracted data

We use cookies to provide a better user experience.