In this paper we present an extension of first-order predicate logic with placeholders. These placeholders allow the construction of proofs for incomplete theorems. These theorems can be completed during the proof construction process. By using special definitions of substitutions and replacements, we obtain an unexpectedly simple cal- culus. Furthermore, we avoid the need of additional rules for explicit substitutions to deal with postponed substitutions in placeholders, since the definitions of substitution and replacement deal with them directly
We give a first-order presentation of higher-order logic based on explicit substitutions. This prese...
In informal mathematical usage we often reason using languages with binding. We usually find ourselv...
In informal mathematical usage we often reason using languages with binding. We usually find ourselv...
In this paper we present an extension of first-order predicate logic with placeholders. These placeh...
In this paper we present an extension of first-order predicate logic with placeholders. These placeh...
Abstract. In this paper we present an extension of first-order predi-cate logic with placeholders. T...
We present an abstract development of Gödel’s incompleteness theorems, performed with the help of th...
We present an abstract development of Gödel’s incompleteness theorems, performed with the help of th...
AbstractIt is known that incompleteness of Hoare's logic relative to certain data type specification...
AbstractWorking within a semantic framework for sequent calculi developed in [3], we propose a coupl...
We extend the classical first order logic with partially defined iota terms in order to model the wa...
Abstract. In the process of interactive theorem proving one often works with incomplete higher order...
When proving a theorem, one makes intermediate claims, leaving parts temporarily unspecified. These ...
We present an extension of Stålmarck's method to classical first order predicate logic. Stålmarck's ...
In informal mathematical usage we often reason using languages with binding. We usually find ourselv...
We give a first-order presentation of higher-order logic based on explicit substitutions. This prese...
In informal mathematical usage we often reason using languages with binding. We usually find ourselv...
In informal mathematical usage we often reason using languages with binding. We usually find ourselv...
In this paper we present an extension of first-order predicate logic with placeholders. These placeh...
In this paper we present an extension of first-order predicate logic with placeholders. These placeh...
Abstract. In this paper we present an extension of first-order predi-cate logic with placeholders. T...
We present an abstract development of Gödel’s incompleteness theorems, performed with the help of th...
We present an abstract development of Gödel’s incompleteness theorems, performed with the help of th...
AbstractIt is known that incompleteness of Hoare's logic relative to certain data type specification...
AbstractWorking within a semantic framework for sequent calculi developed in [3], we propose a coupl...
We extend the classical first order logic with partially defined iota terms in order to model the wa...
Abstract. In the process of interactive theorem proving one often works with incomplete higher order...
When proving a theorem, one makes intermediate claims, leaving parts temporarily unspecified. These ...
We present an extension of Stålmarck's method to classical first order predicate logic. Stålmarck's ...
In informal mathematical usage we often reason using languages with binding. We usually find ourselv...
We give a first-order presentation of higher-order logic based on explicit substitutions. This prese...
In informal mathematical usage we often reason using languages with binding. We usually find ourselv...
In informal mathematical usage we often reason using languages with binding. We usually find ourselv...