This essay reply to the criticisms of my book Conflitti pratici. Quando il diritto diventa immmorale raised by Alberto Andronico, Francisco Javier Ansuátegui Roig, Francesco Biasetti, Tommaso Greco, Eugenio Lecaldano, Ulderico Pomarici and Francesco Viola. The paper focuses on the task of legal philosophy in teaching and in the public debate, the distinction between legal positivism and legal non-positivism, the relationship between metaethics and legal philosophy, the nature of practical conflicts, and the connection between rules and values
L'articolo sostiene che la concezione aristotelica della ragion pratica è più capace di spiegare la ...
The essay revolves around the idea that the normal executability in a specific form of the "modern" ...
The contribution examines the different versions of eliminativism concerning the concept of law (pra...
This essay reply to the criticisms of my book Conflitti pratici. Quando il diritto diventa immmorale...
This essay reply to the criticisms of my book "Conflitti pratici". Quando il diritto diventa immmora...
This paper comments on some passages of the book by Damiano Canale with particular reference to its...
After a preliminary clarification on the role of the philosophy of law in legal education, this essa...
This paper is divided in two parts. In the first one Damiano Canale’s description of practical conf...
This paper attempts to look Francesco Gentile's concept of the Law under phenomenological point of v...
The paper attempts to respond to a number of objections that have been formulated in the book Ethics...
Sino alla prima metà del xx secolo tutti i principali giuspositivisti condividevano l’idea che il po...
This paper deals with some of the issues discussed by Vittorio Villa in his latest book – the relati...
This essay is part of a Symposium on my book "La ragione e i suoi eccessi". In my reply, I answer to...
In this paper, I reply to the objections and solicitations of the critics who intervened in the symp...
L'articolo sostiene che la concezione aristotelica della ragion pratica è più capace di spiegare la ...
The essay revolves around the idea that the normal executability in a specific form of the "modern" ...
The contribution examines the different versions of eliminativism concerning the concept of law (pra...
This essay reply to the criticisms of my book Conflitti pratici. Quando il diritto diventa immmorale...
This essay reply to the criticisms of my book "Conflitti pratici". Quando il diritto diventa immmora...
This paper comments on some passages of the book by Damiano Canale with particular reference to its...
After a preliminary clarification on the role of the philosophy of law in legal education, this essa...
This paper is divided in two parts. In the first one Damiano Canale’s description of practical conf...
This paper attempts to look Francesco Gentile's concept of the Law under phenomenological point of v...
The paper attempts to respond to a number of objections that have been formulated in the book Ethics...
Sino alla prima metà del xx secolo tutti i principali giuspositivisti condividevano l’idea che il po...
This paper deals with some of the issues discussed by Vittorio Villa in his latest book – the relati...
This essay is part of a Symposium on my book "La ragione e i suoi eccessi". In my reply, I answer to...
In this paper, I reply to the objections and solicitations of the critics who intervened in the symp...
L'articolo sostiene che la concezione aristotelica della ragion pratica è più capace di spiegare la ...
The essay revolves around the idea that the normal executability in a specific form of the "modern" ...
The contribution examines the different versions of eliminativism concerning the concept of law (pra...