The paper aims to discuss the remarks and criticisms that have been raised in the essays discussing my book The Life of Concepts. Hegel, Bachelard, Canguilhem. I focus firstly on the relationship that I establish between conceptual history and epistemology of concepts; then, I consider some purely epistemological criticisms; finally, I focus on the problem of political science and its relationship with the social sciences. In the last section of the paper, I attempt to address the more comprehensive question of the role of philosophy and its relationship to sciences
Questo articolo è stato sottoposto a un processo di double-blind peer review. Negli ultimi anni si ...
Based on a discussion of Pierpaolo Cesaroni’s latest book, La vita dei concetti, this article aims t...
The paper attempts to respond to a number of objections that have been formulated in the book Ethics...
The paper aims to discuss the remarks and criticisms that have been raised in the essays discussing ...
In this article I reconstruct, discuss, and develop both the understanding of scientific practice an...
In this article we discuss Pierpaolo Cesaroni’s book The life of concepts. Hegel, Bachelard, Canguil...
This essay is part of a Symposium on my book "La ragione e i suoi eccessi". In my reply, I answer to...
A discussion of the birth, evolution and main problems of the discipline called philosopy of science...
The aim of this paper is to create a better understanding of issues related to the configuration and...
Starting from a general problematisation of the role of philosophy today, this article thematises th...
In my paper I will discuss Fanciullacci’s book L’esperienza etica. Per una filosofia delle cose uman...
This paper comments on some passages of the book by Damiano Canale with particular reference to its...
Quando si parla di Italian Theory ci si riferisce a un canone, a un paradigma, a un contro-canone, a...
The paper is focused on the following philosophical issues discussed by Paolo Bettineschi in his boo...
In this paper, I reply to the objections and solicitations of the critics who intervened in the symp...
Questo articolo è stato sottoposto a un processo di double-blind peer review. Negli ultimi anni si ...
Based on a discussion of Pierpaolo Cesaroni’s latest book, La vita dei concetti, this article aims t...
The paper attempts to respond to a number of objections that have been formulated in the book Ethics...
The paper aims to discuss the remarks and criticisms that have been raised in the essays discussing ...
In this article I reconstruct, discuss, and develop both the understanding of scientific practice an...
In this article we discuss Pierpaolo Cesaroni’s book The life of concepts. Hegel, Bachelard, Canguil...
This essay is part of a Symposium on my book "La ragione e i suoi eccessi". In my reply, I answer to...
A discussion of the birth, evolution and main problems of the discipline called philosopy of science...
The aim of this paper is to create a better understanding of issues related to the configuration and...
Starting from a general problematisation of the role of philosophy today, this article thematises th...
In my paper I will discuss Fanciullacci’s book L’esperienza etica. Per una filosofia delle cose uman...
This paper comments on some passages of the book by Damiano Canale with particular reference to its...
Quando si parla di Italian Theory ci si riferisce a un canone, a un paradigma, a un contro-canone, a...
The paper is focused on the following philosophical issues discussed by Paolo Bettineschi in his boo...
In this paper, I reply to the objections and solicitations of the critics who intervened in the symp...
Questo articolo è stato sottoposto a un processo di double-blind peer review. Negli ultimi anni si ...
Based on a discussion of Pierpaolo Cesaroni’s latest book, La vita dei concetti, this article aims t...
The paper attempts to respond to a number of objections that have been formulated in the book Ethics...