Politicians sometimes break their promises. Canadian law is clear that the only recourse is for voters at the ballot box. However, politicians who happen to be lawyers are ostensibly governed by the rules of professional conduct. Under these rules, certain promises, termed undertakings, are special. Courts and law societies will enforce these promises and/or impose consequences for their breach against practicing lawyers. This article considers how the rule on undertakings should apply to political promises made by lawyer-politicians. The article begins with a brief summary of the rules of professional conduct as they apply to lawyer-politicians and to lawyers’ undertakings. The article then turns to the case law on broken political promise...
The ‘resolutions movement ’ – a popular political mobilisation guided by lawyers, and expressed in ...
Is breaking the law a politically risky act for politicians and other public officials? The question...
In Canada (Attorney General) v. Federation of Law Societies of Canada, a majority of the Supreme Cou...
Politicians sometimes break their promises. Canadian law is clear that the only recourse is for vote...
Canadian legal ethics has paid little attention to how the rules of professional conduct for lawyers...
Canadian legal ethics has paid little attention to how the rules of professional conduct for lawyers...
The ability to engage in political activity is an essential feature of a democratic society. However...
This article will examine whether the American Bar Association’s (“ABA”) Model Rules of Professional...
Government lawyers are significant actors in the Canadian legal profession, yet they are largely ign...
Attorneys have special social privileges; they can file complaints on behalf of clients, and compel ...
Despite the recent growth in the Canadian literature on legal ethics for government lawyers, the lea...
This Note does not argue that campaign speech should always be held to the same standards of accurac...
The law holds lawyers to a more demanding standard of conduct than others when it comes to aspects o...
Numerous lawyers contributed to the disinformation campaign that led to the storming of the U.S. Cap...
The Canadian rules of professional conduct constrain lawyers’ speech. Among other things, the rules ...
The ‘resolutions movement ’ – a popular political mobilisation guided by lawyers, and expressed in ...
Is breaking the law a politically risky act for politicians and other public officials? The question...
In Canada (Attorney General) v. Federation of Law Societies of Canada, a majority of the Supreme Cou...
Politicians sometimes break their promises. Canadian law is clear that the only recourse is for vote...
Canadian legal ethics has paid little attention to how the rules of professional conduct for lawyers...
Canadian legal ethics has paid little attention to how the rules of professional conduct for lawyers...
The ability to engage in political activity is an essential feature of a democratic society. However...
This article will examine whether the American Bar Association’s (“ABA”) Model Rules of Professional...
Government lawyers are significant actors in the Canadian legal profession, yet they are largely ign...
Attorneys have special social privileges; they can file complaints on behalf of clients, and compel ...
Despite the recent growth in the Canadian literature on legal ethics for government lawyers, the lea...
This Note does not argue that campaign speech should always be held to the same standards of accurac...
The law holds lawyers to a more demanding standard of conduct than others when it comes to aspects o...
Numerous lawyers contributed to the disinformation campaign that led to the storming of the U.S. Cap...
The Canadian rules of professional conduct constrain lawyers’ speech. Among other things, the rules ...
The ‘resolutions movement ’ – a popular political mobilisation guided by lawyers, and expressed in ...
Is breaking the law a politically risky act for politicians and other public officials? The question...
In Canada (Attorney General) v. Federation of Law Societies of Canada, a majority of the Supreme Cou...