The defendant was the owner of a gravel pit, separated from his railway shipping facilities by a highway, the fee of a portion of which was owned by the plaintiff. A bill was filed to restrain the construction under the highway of a passageway between the railroad and the gravel pit, permission for which construction had been granted by the state highway commissioner. The bill was dismissed, and on appeal, held, by an evenly-divided court, that the judgment be affirmed. Grand Rapids Gravel Co. v. William J. Breen Gravel Co., 262 Mich. 365, 247 N. W. 902 (1933)
Under the regulations promulgated by the Railroad Administration in 1918, all actions for injury to...
At head of title: The Circuit court of the United States for the Western district of Michigan, south...
Plaintiffs claimed an easement by implied grant in a driveway situated wholly on defendants\u27 land...
The defendant was the owner of a gravel pit, separated from his railway shipping facilities by a hig...
By the plat, the lots of P and D in the unincorporated village of Crescent were separated by a stree...
Plaintiff, operator of a boat company, owned land adjoining a river. X held land between that of the...
In a recent Michigan case it appeared that for more than the statutory period of limitation the plai...
An Iowa venue statute passed in 1872 provided that an action may be brought against any railway cor...
In conformity with the Texas statute regulating contract carriers, the plaintiffs applied for permit...
The construction of the Benzal Bridge over the White River in rural Arkansas brought about years of ...
The Act allows local government authorities to eliminate grade crossings in the interest of public s...
Thesis (B.S.) Massachusetts Institute of Technology. Dept. of Civil Engineering, 1949.Bibliography: ...
While the weight of authority is probably to the effect that railroad rights of way may be lost by a...
In grading a street for the purpose of paving, it was necessary to remove earth which the city had n...
In 1911 the Indiana State Railroad commissioner issued a court order for the Wabash Rail Road to bui...
Under the regulations promulgated by the Railroad Administration in 1918, all actions for injury to...
At head of title: The Circuit court of the United States for the Western district of Michigan, south...
Plaintiffs claimed an easement by implied grant in a driveway situated wholly on defendants\u27 land...
The defendant was the owner of a gravel pit, separated from his railway shipping facilities by a hig...
By the plat, the lots of P and D in the unincorporated village of Crescent were separated by a stree...
Plaintiff, operator of a boat company, owned land adjoining a river. X held land between that of the...
In a recent Michigan case it appeared that for more than the statutory period of limitation the plai...
An Iowa venue statute passed in 1872 provided that an action may be brought against any railway cor...
In conformity with the Texas statute regulating contract carriers, the plaintiffs applied for permit...
The construction of the Benzal Bridge over the White River in rural Arkansas brought about years of ...
The Act allows local government authorities to eliminate grade crossings in the interest of public s...
Thesis (B.S.) Massachusetts Institute of Technology. Dept. of Civil Engineering, 1949.Bibliography: ...
While the weight of authority is probably to the effect that railroad rights of way may be lost by a...
In grading a street for the purpose of paving, it was necessary to remove earth which the city had n...
In 1911 the Indiana State Railroad commissioner issued a court order for the Wabash Rail Road to bui...
Under the regulations promulgated by the Railroad Administration in 1918, all actions for injury to...
At head of title: The Circuit court of the United States for the Western district of Michigan, south...
Plaintiffs claimed an easement by implied grant in a driveway situated wholly on defendants\u27 land...