In this paper, I will first describe the traditional approach to the use of experts in Canadian courts. Then I will consider whether, on this approach, health care ethics experts should be permitted to testify in Canadian courts. I will argue that they should be permitted to testify but caution should be exercised by the courts, the parties, and the experts themselves. The objective of the paper is to highlight the strengths and raise some concerns about the weaknesses of a practice that appears to be growing, so that the potential harmful consequences might be anticipated, problems with the practice might be avoided and the potential benefits might be maximized
The subject of this thesis is the investigation and critical evaluation of how Canadian legal instit...
Summary: The expert witness\u27 job is often described as a balancing act: duty to clients on the on...
THE SUPREMECOURT, BASED ON 3 DECISIONS OVER THEpast decade, now requires judges to examine the un-de...
In this paper, I will first describe the traditional approach to the use of experts in Canadian cour...
ABSTRACT. There is great skepticism about the admittance of expert normative ethics testimony into e...
The expansion of human knowledge requires thatcourts of law increasingly rely on expert witnesses,in...
The expansion of human knowledge requires thatcourts of law increasingly rely on expert witnesses,in...
This short perspective piece is about the documentation of clinical ethics consultation in C...
This paper represents an effort at making expert medical testimony, one field of the medical profess...
Expert evidence plays a central role in establishing the relevant standard of care in medical litiga...
For as long as the use of party-retained experts has been a feature of the common law tradition, the...
Doctors are often asked to provide expert evidence for the courts. Whilst there is a considerable bo...
Historically, the Supreme Court of Canada has avoided direct intervention in health care policy-maki...
The propriety of expert ethics testimony in the courtroom is as contentious in academic scholarship ...
The Supreme Court of Canada’s landmark decisions in Hopp v Lepp and Reibl v Hughes furnished a gener...
The subject of this thesis is the investigation and critical evaluation of how Canadian legal instit...
Summary: The expert witness\u27 job is often described as a balancing act: duty to clients on the on...
THE SUPREMECOURT, BASED ON 3 DECISIONS OVER THEpast decade, now requires judges to examine the un-de...
In this paper, I will first describe the traditional approach to the use of experts in Canadian cour...
ABSTRACT. There is great skepticism about the admittance of expert normative ethics testimony into e...
The expansion of human knowledge requires thatcourts of law increasingly rely on expert witnesses,in...
The expansion of human knowledge requires thatcourts of law increasingly rely on expert witnesses,in...
This short perspective piece is about the documentation of clinical ethics consultation in C...
This paper represents an effort at making expert medical testimony, one field of the medical profess...
Expert evidence plays a central role in establishing the relevant standard of care in medical litiga...
For as long as the use of party-retained experts has been a feature of the common law tradition, the...
Doctors are often asked to provide expert evidence for the courts. Whilst there is a considerable bo...
Historically, the Supreme Court of Canada has avoided direct intervention in health care policy-maki...
The propriety of expert ethics testimony in the courtroom is as contentious in academic scholarship ...
The Supreme Court of Canada’s landmark decisions in Hopp v Lepp and Reibl v Hughes furnished a gener...
The subject of this thesis is the investigation and critical evaluation of how Canadian legal instit...
Summary: The expert witness\u27 job is often described as a balancing act: duty to clients on the on...
THE SUPREMECOURT, BASED ON 3 DECISIONS OVER THEpast decade, now requires judges to examine the un-de...