The observed variations in the thickness of the conductive lithosphere, derived from surface wave studies, have a first‐order control on the elevation of the continents, in addition to variations in the thickness of the crust—this defines whole lithosphere isostasy (WLI). Negative buoyancy of the mantle lithosphere counters the positive buoyancy of the crust, and together, their respective thicknesses and density contrasts determine elevation of the continents both in their interiors and at their edges. The average density contrasts for lithospheric mantle with crust and with asthenosphere are typically 300 to 550 and 20 to 40 kg m−3, respectively, with a ratio 10 to 16, suggesting moderate average depletion of lithospheric mantle. We show ...
Global distribution of the strength and effective elastic thickness (Te) of the lithosphere are esti...
We present a new global model for the Earth's lithosphere and upper mantle (LithoRef18) obtained thr...
Peer Reviewedhttp://deepblue.lib.umich.edu/bitstream/2027.42/89572/1/j.1365-246X.2011.05248.x.pd
<p>Differences in predictions of Glacial Isostatic Adjustment (GIA) for Antarctica persist due to un...
A fundamental scientific question is, what controls the Earth's topography? Although the theoretical...
Model outputs from Lamb, S., Moore, J., Perez-Gussinye, M., Stern, T. (2020). Global whole lithosphe...
Large-scale topography may be due to several causes, including (1) variations in crustal thickness a...
We estimate the crust-mantle (Moho) density contrast beneath Antarctica based on solving the inverse...
We estimate the crust-mantle (Moho) density contrast beneath Antarctica based on solving the inverse...
The Antarctic continent is almost entirely ~99% covered by a thick ice layer impeding classical in-s...
Thermal isostasy, that part of isostasy traceable to density differences being caused by temperature...
The strength and effective elastic thickness (Te) of the lithosphere control its response to tectoni...
The choice of crustal and mantle densities in numerical geodynamic models is usually based on conven...
Differences in predictions of Glacial Isostatic Adjustment (GIA) for Antarctica persist due to uncer...
In this study we combine seismological and petrological models with satellite gravity gradient data ...
Global distribution of the strength and effective elastic thickness (Te) of the lithosphere are esti...
We present a new global model for the Earth's lithosphere and upper mantle (LithoRef18) obtained thr...
Peer Reviewedhttp://deepblue.lib.umich.edu/bitstream/2027.42/89572/1/j.1365-246X.2011.05248.x.pd
<p>Differences in predictions of Glacial Isostatic Adjustment (GIA) for Antarctica persist due to un...
A fundamental scientific question is, what controls the Earth's topography? Although the theoretical...
Model outputs from Lamb, S., Moore, J., Perez-Gussinye, M., Stern, T. (2020). Global whole lithosphe...
Large-scale topography may be due to several causes, including (1) variations in crustal thickness a...
We estimate the crust-mantle (Moho) density contrast beneath Antarctica based on solving the inverse...
We estimate the crust-mantle (Moho) density contrast beneath Antarctica based on solving the inverse...
The Antarctic continent is almost entirely ~99% covered by a thick ice layer impeding classical in-s...
Thermal isostasy, that part of isostasy traceable to density differences being caused by temperature...
The strength and effective elastic thickness (Te) of the lithosphere control its response to tectoni...
The choice of crustal and mantle densities in numerical geodynamic models is usually based on conven...
Differences in predictions of Glacial Isostatic Adjustment (GIA) for Antarctica persist due to uncer...
In this study we combine seismological and petrological models with satellite gravity gradient data ...
Global distribution of the strength and effective elastic thickness (Te) of the lithosphere are esti...
We present a new global model for the Earth's lithosphere and upper mantle (LithoRef18) obtained thr...
Peer Reviewedhttp://deepblue.lib.umich.edu/bitstream/2027.42/89572/1/j.1365-246X.2011.05248.x.pd