This dissertation proposes multiple alternatives that circumvent the inherent reliance on binary thinking in queer theory. Straitjacketing ‘queer’ as an unyielding binary to the normative has multiple limitations. For one, this conception connotes a form of stasis. Even if ‘queer’ celebrates difference in diversity and deviates from linear prescriptions of being, its political ambivalence manifests through its complicity with, and dependence on, the normative matrices it seeks to subvert. It is as if queerness has no vitality to queer unless it relies upon these normative matrices to locate its departure. Using a transmediative approach to queering, the dissertation examines three different primary sources that are by no means constrained b...