Objective: To compare the effectiveness of en-masse retraction of maxillary anterior teeth using temporary anchorage devices with and without orthodontic appliances on the posterior teeth.Methods:In the study, 20 participants (18.25 ± 4.07 years) meeting the inclusion criteria were randomly divided into 2 groups using the sequentially numbered opaque sealed envelopes method. In group I (control group, n = 10), en-masse retraction was carried out with conventional high hooks soldered to the retraction wire and posterior teeth were included. In group II (experimental group, n = 10), the en-masse retraction was carried out without an orthodontic appliance on posterior teeth and a modified retraction wire was incorporated. In both groups, mini-...
Introduction: The objective of this pilot randomized clinical trial was to investigate the relative ...
Objective: To compare the anchorage effects of the implants and the headgear for patients with anter...
Background: Anchorage in orthodontics can be provided through several extra- and intra-oral sources ...
Objective: To compare the amount of anchorage loss of the maxillary posterior teeth and amount of re...
Objective: To compare the amount of anchorage loss of the maxillary posterior teeth and amount of re...
Objective: To measure and compare the amount, rate and anchor loss after the en masse retraction of ...
Objective: To evaluate the available evidence regarding the clinical effectiveness of different type...
Background: This review aims to compare the effectiveness of en masse and two-step retraction method...
Objective: Evaluation of anchorage loss following anterior segment retraction (ASR) using friction v...
The purpose of this study was to investigate the stability of temporary anchorage devices, rate of b...
Abstract Background/aim Retraction of the upper incisors/canines requires maximum anchorage. The aim...
Background: Anchorage in orthodontics can be provided through several extra- and intra-oral sources ...
Aim: The aim of this study was to investigate the degree of external apical root resorption (EARR) f...
Introduction: The objective of this pilot randomized clinical trial was to investigate the relative ...
Objective: To compare the anchorage effects of the implants and the headgear for patients with anter...
Background: Anchorage in orthodontics can be provided through several extra- and intra-oral sources ...
Objective: To compare the amount of anchorage loss of the maxillary posterior teeth and amount of re...
Objective: To compare the amount of anchorage loss of the maxillary posterior teeth and amount of re...
Objective: To measure and compare the amount, rate and anchor loss after the en masse retraction of ...
Objective: To evaluate the available evidence regarding the clinical effectiveness of different type...
Background: This review aims to compare the effectiveness of en masse and two-step retraction method...
Objective: Evaluation of anchorage loss following anterior segment retraction (ASR) using friction v...
The purpose of this study was to investigate the stability of temporary anchorage devices, rate of b...
Abstract Background/aim Retraction of the upper incisors/canines requires maximum anchorage. The aim...
Background: Anchorage in orthodontics can be provided through several extra- and intra-oral sources ...
Aim: The aim of this study was to investigate the degree of external apical root resorption (EARR) f...
Introduction: The objective of this pilot randomized clinical trial was to investigate the relative ...
Objective: To compare the anchorage effects of the implants and the headgear for patients with anter...
Background: Anchorage in orthodontics can be provided through several extra- and intra-oral sources ...