Public family law decisions in English courts are ostensibly made to serve the best interests of the child, whose interests are given paramountcy under the Children Act 1989. Hence, there is little recognition of the capacity for decisions to constitute miscarriages of justice. This issue is of concern as research suggests that some family court decisions can have devastating long lasting consequences. This article considers the reasons why the ‘best interests’ narrative has dominated discussion in this area and asks, by considering the process of public family court decisions, whether less restrictive thinking is indicated. It is concluded that the public family law process lacks the checks and balances of the criminal justice system in it...
Who should have the ultimate say over a child's medical treatment? A series of high-profile withdraw...
This article presents the inherent contradiction between a parent-child relationship that has steadi...
Who should have the ultimate say over a child's medical treatment? A series of high-profile withdraw...
This is a pre-copy-editing, author-produced PDF of an article accepted for publication in Current Le...
The Children and Families Act 2014 has introduced a 26-week timeline for Children Act 1989 care and ...
The principle of open justice underlies public accessibility to courts and accountability of decisio...
The principle of open justice underlies public accessibility to courts and accountability of decisio...
The functions of family courts in England and Wales in making decisions about children are identifie...
The authors examine the themes and provisions of the Hague Convention on the Civil Aspects of Intern...
The functions of family courts in England and Wales in making decisions about children are identifie...
Context Local authorities with serious allegations of significant harm or likely significant harm t...
The functions of family courts in England and Wales in making decisions about children are identifie...
Who should have the ultimate say over a child's medical treatment? A series of high-profile withdraw...
The New Zealand Family Protection Act 1955 asks the courts to decide whether a will-maker has made “...
The functions of family courts in England and Wales in making decisions about children are identifie...
Who should have the ultimate say over a child's medical treatment? A series of high-profile withdraw...
This article presents the inherent contradiction between a parent-child relationship that has steadi...
Who should have the ultimate say over a child's medical treatment? A series of high-profile withdraw...
This is a pre-copy-editing, author-produced PDF of an article accepted for publication in Current Le...
The Children and Families Act 2014 has introduced a 26-week timeline for Children Act 1989 care and ...
The principle of open justice underlies public accessibility to courts and accountability of decisio...
The principle of open justice underlies public accessibility to courts and accountability of decisio...
The functions of family courts in England and Wales in making decisions about children are identifie...
The authors examine the themes and provisions of the Hague Convention on the Civil Aspects of Intern...
The functions of family courts in England and Wales in making decisions about children are identifie...
Context Local authorities with serious allegations of significant harm or likely significant harm t...
The functions of family courts in England and Wales in making decisions about children are identifie...
Who should have the ultimate say over a child's medical treatment? A series of high-profile withdraw...
The New Zealand Family Protection Act 1955 asks the courts to decide whether a will-maker has made “...
The functions of family courts in England and Wales in making decisions about children are identifie...
Who should have the ultimate say over a child's medical treatment? A series of high-profile withdraw...
This article presents the inherent contradiction between a parent-child relationship that has steadi...
Who should have the ultimate say over a child's medical treatment? A series of high-profile withdraw...