In the last two decades, blame has become a core topic in ethics, philosophical moral psychology and, more recently, epistemology. This chapter aims at clarifying the complex state of the debate and at making a suggestion for how we should proceed from here. The core idea is that accounts of blame are often motivated by very different background goals. One standard goal is to provide a unifying account of our everyday blame practices. The chapter argues that there is reason to think that this goal is not achievable. Another goal is to provide the tools for solving or clarifying important social or philosophical problems. The chapter suggests that this is what theories of blame should focus on
This paper outlines a new conative theory of blame. I argue that the best-known conative approaches ...
I argue that the problem of responsibility for attitudes is best understood as a puzzle about how we...
Thesis (Ph.D.)--University of Washington, 2016-12I argue for an account of blame as a reactive attit...
In the last two decades, blame has become a core topic in ethics, philosophical moral psychology and...
Blame is multifarious. It can be passionate or dispassionate. It can be expressed or kept private. W...
This work examines the social practice of blaming, beginning with a prominent view of the moral phil...
What it is for us to blame an individual, and when is our blame appropriate? While moral psychologis...
This paper looks at judgments of guilt in the face of alleged wrong-doing, be it in public or in pri...
In this dissertation I argue that philosophical theorizing about moral responsibility has not paid s...
Blame is fascinating yet elusive, and it is both of these things because it is so complex. It seems ...
This paper puts forward an account of blame combining two ideas that are usually set up against each...
This paper provides a critical overview of recent work on epistemic blame. The paper identifies key ...
Much of the philosophical work on moral responsibility assumes that we should understand people’s mo...
The following paper examines the relevance of both Reasons Basicness and The Second-Personal Standpo...
This paper outlines a new conative theory of blame. I argue that the best-known conative approaches ...
I argue that the problem of responsibility for attitudes is best understood as a puzzle about how we...
Thesis (Ph.D.)--University of Washington, 2016-12I argue for an account of blame as a reactive attit...
In the last two decades, blame has become a core topic in ethics, philosophical moral psychology and...
Blame is multifarious. It can be passionate or dispassionate. It can be expressed or kept private. W...
This work examines the social practice of blaming, beginning with a prominent view of the moral phil...
What it is for us to blame an individual, and when is our blame appropriate? While moral psychologis...
This paper looks at judgments of guilt in the face of alleged wrong-doing, be it in public or in pri...
In this dissertation I argue that philosophical theorizing about moral responsibility has not paid s...
Blame is fascinating yet elusive, and it is both of these things because it is so complex. It seems ...
This paper puts forward an account of blame combining two ideas that are usually set up against each...
This paper provides a critical overview of recent work on epistemic blame. The paper identifies key ...
Much of the philosophical work on moral responsibility assumes that we should understand people’s mo...
The following paper examines the relevance of both Reasons Basicness and The Second-Personal Standpo...
This paper outlines a new conative theory of blame. I argue that the best-known conative approaches ...
I argue that the problem of responsibility for attitudes is best understood as a puzzle about how we...
Thesis (Ph.D.)--University of Washington, 2016-12I argue for an account of blame as a reactive attit...