In this paper, we compare deterrence, settlement, and litigation spending under adversarial and inquisitorial systems. We present a basic litigation model with three sequential stages—care, settlement, litigation—and we test the predictions on experimental data. In line with our theoretical expectations, we fnd that, compared with the adversarial system, the inquisitorial system is associated with lower litigation spending, lower rates of cases settled, and tends to strengthen deterrenc
An arbiter can decide a case on the basis of his priors, or the two parties to the conflict may pres...
We study the impact of plea bargaining on decision errors and operating costs of the inquisitorial j...
We consider a situation in which one party (the plaintiff) has a legally admissible claim for damage...
In this paper, we compare deterrence, settlement, and litigation spending under adversarial and inqu...
This paper compares the relative merits of adversarial and inquisitorial systems of civil procedure ...
Following its landmark decisions in Bell Atlantic v. Twombly and Ashcroft v. Iqbal, the Supreme Cour...
This paper analyzes how the adversarial and inquisitorial evidence collection procedures affect fina...
We develop a stylized game theoretic model of litigant behavior to study the effects of increased pl...
This paper analyzes how the adversarial and inquisitorial evidence collection procedures affect fina...
This paper presents a strategic model of liability and litigation under court errors. Our framework ...
The payoff received by a successful plaintiff in a lawsuit affects a plaintiff’s litigation decision...
This paper develops a model of law enforcement in which the indicted and the enforcer can negotiate ...
This paper develops a model of law enforcement in which the indicted and the enforcer can negotiate ...
This paper examines the deterrence properties of aggregate litigation and class actions, with an emp...
We model the decision by two contestants to select one of two conflict resolution forums in which to...
An arbiter can decide a case on the basis of his priors, or the two parties to the conflict may pres...
We study the impact of plea bargaining on decision errors and operating costs of the inquisitorial j...
We consider a situation in which one party (the plaintiff) has a legally admissible claim for damage...
In this paper, we compare deterrence, settlement, and litigation spending under adversarial and inqu...
This paper compares the relative merits of adversarial and inquisitorial systems of civil procedure ...
Following its landmark decisions in Bell Atlantic v. Twombly and Ashcroft v. Iqbal, the Supreme Cour...
This paper analyzes how the adversarial and inquisitorial evidence collection procedures affect fina...
We develop a stylized game theoretic model of litigant behavior to study the effects of increased pl...
This paper analyzes how the adversarial and inquisitorial evidence collection procedures affect fina...
This paper presents a strategic model of liability and litigation under court errors. Our framework ...
The payoff received by a successful plaintiff in a lawsuit affects a plaintiff’s litigation decision...
This paper develops a model of law enforcement in which the indicted and the enforcer can negotiate ...
This paper develops a model of law enforcement in which the indicted and the enforcer can negotiate ...
This paper examines the deterrence properties of aggregate litigation and class actions, with an emp...
We model the decision by two contestants to select one of two conflict resolution forums in which to...
An arbiter can decide a case on the basis of his priors, or the two parties to the conflict may pres...
We study the impact of plea bargaining on decision errors and operating costs of the inquisitorial j...
We consider a situation in which one party (the plaintiff) has a legally admissible claim for damage...