ObjectiveTo assess how inadequate reporting of cointerventions influences estimated treatment effects in recent cardiovascular trials.MethodsMedline/Embase were systematically searched from January 1, 2011 to July 1, 2021 for trials evaluating pharmacologic interventions on clinical cardiovascular outcomes published in 5 high-impact journals. Information on adequate vs inadequate reporting of cointerventions, blinding, risk of bias due to deviations of intended interventions (low vs high/some concerns), funding (nonindustry vs industry), design (superiority vs noninferiority), and results were assessed by 2 reviewers. The association with effect sizes was assessed using meta-regression random-effect analysis, expressed as ratios o...
<div><p>Industry-sponsored clinical drug studies are associated with publication of outcomes that fa...
Objective: To determine (i) the difference in the frequency of serious adverse events (SAEs) reporte...
Objectives: To provide information on the frequency and reasons for outcome reporting bias in clinic...
Background A cointervention in a randomized clinical trial (RCT) is medical care given in addition t...
BACKGROUND: A cointervention in a randomized clinical trial (RCT) is medical care given in addition ...
Importance: Changes in evidence-based practice and guideline recommendations depend on high-quality ...
Background—Prior work indicates that therapeutic trials funded by for-profit organizations are more ...
Background: Under-reporting of clinical trial results inhibits dissemination of knowledge, limits un...
OBJECTIVE: To examine whether the association of inadequate or unclear allocation concealment and la...
Industry-sponsored clinical drug studies are associated with publication of outcomes that favor the ...
OBJECTIVES: To identify factors associated with discrepant outcome reporting in randomized drug tria...
OBJECTIVE: To examine whether the association of inadequate or unclear allocation concealment and la...
OBJECTIVES To identify factors associated with discrepant outcome reporting in randomized drug tr...
Background: Discrepancies between pre-specified and reported outcomes are an important source of bia...
Randomized clinical trials (RCTs) are considered the gold standard for evidence-based medicine. Howe...
<div><p>Industry-sponsored clinical drug studies are associated with publication of outcomes that fa...
Objective: To determine (i) the difference in the frequency of serious adverse events (SAEs) reporte...
Objectives: To provide information on the frequency and reasons for outcome reporting bias in clinic...
Background A cointervention in a randomized clinical trial (RCT) is medical care given in addition t...
BACKGROUND: A cointervention in a randomized clinical trial (RCT) is medical care given in addition ...
Importance: Changes in evidence-based practice and guideline recommendations depend on high-quality ...
Background—Prior work indicates that therapeutic trials funded by for-profit organizations are more ...
Background: Under-reporting of clinical trial results inhibits dissemination of knowledge, limits un...
OBJECTIVE: To examine whether the association of inadequate or unclear allocation concealment and la...
Industry-sponsored clinical drug studies are associated with publication of outcomes that favor the ...
OBJECTIVES: To identify factors associated with discrepant outcome reporting in randomized drug tria...
OBJECTIVE: To examine whether the association of inadequate or unclear allocation concealment and la...
OBJECTIVES To identify factors associated with discrepant outcome reporting in randomized drug tr...
Background: Discrepancies between pre-specified and reported outcomes are an important source of bia...
Randomized clinical trials (RCTs) are considered the gold standard for evidence-based medicine. Howe...
<div><p>Industry-sponsored clinical drug studies are associated with publication of outcomes that fa...
Objective: To determine (i) the difference in the frequency of serious adverse events (SAEs) reporte...
Objectives: To provide information on the frequency and reasons for outcome reporting bias in clinic...