Add to ORKGIn Studies in the History of Exegesis (2022), edited by Mark W. Elliott, Raleigh C. Heth, and Angela Zautcke.https://scholarship.shu.edu/faculty-publications/1056/thumbnail.jp
In letter 37 to Johannes Bouwmeester, Spinoza identifies a historiola mentis a la Bacon as an import...
Monnot Guy. Miriam Levering (ed.), Rethinking Scripture. Essays from a Comparative Perspective. Alba...
This book offers two things in particular: first, these are papers that have been commented on and r...
Bacon’s influence on Spinoza’s thought is controversial, since this latter seems to underestimate t...
This paper resolves some puzzles regarding Spinoza’s appropriations and rejections of various aspect...
This publication compares Spinoza’s method for interpreting the Bible and Vico’s method for interpr...
Once in a great while a series of unintentional mistakes which could go unremarked, reach a mass and...
In the study of the history of biblical scholarship, there has been a tendency among historians to e...
The interpretation of Spinoza which follows, situates itself in the context of a study of the fundam...
This book investigates the biblical criticism of Spinoza from the perspective of the Dutch Reformed ...
This paper projects Spinoza’s discussion of the method of scriptural interpretation onto contemporar...
The last thirty years or so have seen the introduction of a wide variety of new methods in studies o...
Francis Bacon (1561-1626) is famous for encouraging hands-on studies of nature when natural philosop...
In the line of B. Barret-Kriegel, La défaite de l’érudition, the author attempts to clarify the orig...
Despite his long-standing opposition to Spinoza, Christian Wolff was depicted by many as a crypto-Sp...
In letter 37 to Johannes Bouwmeester, Spinoza identifies a historiola mentis a la Bacon as an import...
Monnot Guy. Miriam Levering (ed.), Rethinking Scripture. Essays from a Comparative Perspective. Alba...
This book offers two things in particular: first, these are papers that have been commented on and r...
Bacon’s influence on Spinoza’s thought is controversial, since this latter seems to underestimate t...
This paper resolves some puzzles regarding Spinoza’s appropriations and rejections of various aspect...
This publication compares Spinoza’s method for interpreting the Bible and Vico’s method for interpr...
Once in a great while a series of unintentional mistakes which could go unremarked, reach a mass and...
In the study of the history of biblical scholarship, there has been a tendency among historians to e...
The interpretation of Spinoza which follows, situates itself in the context of a study of the fundam...
This book investigates the biblical criticism of Spinoza from the perspective of the Dutch Reformed ...
This paper projects Spinoza’s discussion of the method of scriptural interpretation onto contemporar...
The last thirty years or so have seen the introduction of a wide variety of new methods in studies o...
Francis Bacon (1561-1626) is famous for encouraging hands-on studies of nature when natural philosop...
In the line of B. Barret-Kriegel, La défaite de l’érudition, the author attempts to clarify the orig...
Despite his long-standing opposition to Spinoza, Christian Wolff was depicted by many as a crypto-Sp...
In letter 37 to Johannes Bouwmeester, Spinoza identifies a historiola mentis a la Bacon as an import...
Monnot Guy. Miriam Levering (ed.), Rethinking Scripture. Essays from a Comparative Perspective. Alba...
This book offers two things in particular: first, these are papers that have been commented on and r...