31 years of the political constitution, has the principle of constitutional supremacy been achieved?

Desde su promulgación, la interpretación de la Norma Constitución ha generado diversos sentimientos, unos de apoyo y otros por el contrario de rechazo. En la actualidad, nos encontramos ante un cambio institucional que atemoriza a todos aquellos que consideran el orden Constitucional, como el único mecanismo capaz de controlar las fuerzas totalitaristas que buscan la destrucción del principio democrático. Así, hoy más que nunca, se hace necesario determinar si la norma superior aun irradia a todo el ordenamiento jurídico o en su defecto, se ha desmaterializado su fin de protección “DIGNIDAD HUMANA”. Para ello, iniciaremos con un breve recorrido que nos indicara desde una perspectiva teleológica e histórica, las razones que incidieron en la transformación de la carta política de 1886. Donde podremos observar los errores que no permitieron al régimen constitucional pasado enmendar su camino en aras de materializar los derechos que fueron reclamados por muchos ciudadanos de manera violenta. Seguidamente, se establecerá las implicaciones que contrae la SUPREMACÍA CONSTITUCIONAL de 1991 ante la inaplicación efectiva de los mecanismos de protección que se desprenden de la misma. Por último, desde la visión social, se buscará determinar en qué medida el GARANTISMO CONSTITUCIONAL satisface las necesidades de la sociedad y logra mantener un control político-jurídico en las personas que ostentan el poder por un tiempo determinado. En este sentido y, entendiendo que la norma política es solo un mecanismo político-normativo que permite estructurar el orden administrativo y social, en el cual se crean dispositivos de protección ciudadana, se hace viable determinar si la VOLUNTAD POLÍTICA permite la materialización de los derechos, o en su defecto está siendo utilizada al antojo de un poder totalitario que busca sustituir la carta para mantener el poder absoluto.Since its promulgation, the interpretation of the Constitution has generated different feelings, some of support and others of rejection. support and others, on the contrary, of rejection. Currently, we are facing an institutional change that frightens all those who consider the Constitutional those who consider the Constitutional order as the only mechanism capable of controlling the totalitarian forces that seek to destroy the totalitarian forces that seek the destruction of the democratic principle. Thus, today more than ever, it is necessary to determine the superior norm still radiates throughout the entire legal system or, failing that, it has been dematerialized. dematerialized its purpose of protection "HUMAN DIGNITY". To do so, we will begin with a brief tour that will indicate us from a teleological and historical perspective, the reasons that influenced the historical perspective, the reasons that influenced the transformation of the political charter of 1886. Where we will be able to observe the errors that did not allow the past constitutional regime to amend its path in order to materialize the rights that were claimed by many citizens. rights that were violently claimed by many citizens. Next, we will establish the implications implications of the CONSTITUTIONAL SUPREMACY of 1991 in the face of the effective inapplication of the mechanisms of protection protection mechanisms that derive from it. Finally, from a social point of view, we will seek to determine to what extent the to determine to what extent CONSTITUTIONAL GUARANTEEISM satisfies the needs of society and manages to maintain a political-legal and manages to maintain a political-legal control on the people who hold power for a certain period of time. In this sense, and understanding that the political norm is only a political-normative mechanism that allows structuring the administrative and social order. administrative and social order, in which citizen protection devices are created, it is feasible to determine whether the VOLUNTARY is viable to determine whether the POLITICAL WILL allows the materialization of rights, or if not, whether it is being used at the whim of the is being used at the whim of a totalitarian power that seeks to replace the charter to maintain absolute power