In this work, we discuss the realisability problem for ranking-based semantics in the area of abstract argumentation. So, for a given ranking and ranking-based semantics, we want to find an AF s.t. the selected ranking-based semantics induces our ranking when applied to the AF. We show that this question can be answered trivially with yes for a number of ranking-based semantics, i.e. for every ranking we can find such an AF. In addition to the discussion about the realisability problem, we also introduce a new equivalence notion for argumentation frameworks. We call two AFs ranking equivalent if they have the same ranking for a ranking-based semantics.</p
International audienceIn this paper we question the ability of the existant ranking semantics for ar...
The principle of counter-transitivity plays a vital role in argumentation. It states that an argumen...
International audienceGradual semantics with abstract argumentation provide each argument with a sco...
In this work, we discuss the realisability problem for ranking-based semantics in the area of abstra...
Argumentation is the process of evaluating and comparing a set of arguments. A way to compare them c...
Argumentation is a process of evaluating and compar-ing a set of arguments. A way to compare them co...
Dung’s theory of abstract argumentation is a formalism that represents conflicting information using...
Argumentation is a process of evaluating and comparing a set of arguments. A way to compare them con...
International audienceTwo kinds of semantics exist for abstract argumentation. Extension-based seman...
Abstract. Recently, ranking-based semantics is proposed to rank-order argu-ments from the most accep...
International audienceIn almost all existing semantics in argumentation, a strong attack has a letha...
International audienceArgumentation is a process of evaluating and comparing sets of arguments. Rank...
International audienceRanking-based semantics are a way of assessing the acceptability of arguments ...
An argumentation system consists of a set of interacting arguments and a semantics for evaluating th...
International audienceIn this paper we question the ability of the existant ranking semantics for ar...
The principle of counter-transitivity plays a vital role in argumentation. It states that an argumen...
International audienceGradual semantics with abstract argumentation provide each argument with a sco...
In this work, we discuss the realisability problem for ranking-based semantics in the area of abstra...
Argumentation is the process of evaluating and comparing a set of arguments. A way to compare them c...
Argumentation is a process of evaluating and compar-ing a set of arguments. A way to compare them co...
Dung’s theory of abstract argumentation is a formalism that represents conflicting information using...
Argumentation is a process of evaluating and comparing a set of arguments. A way to compare them con...
International audienceTwo kinds of semantics exist for abstract argumentation. Extension-based seman...
Abstract. Recently, ranking-based semantics is proposed to rank-order argu-ments from the most accep...
International audienceIn almost all existing semantics in argumentation, a strong attack has a letha...
International audienceArgumentation is a process of evaluating and comparing sets of arguments. Rank...
International audienceRanking-based semantics are a way of assessing the acceptability of arguments ...
An argumentation system consists of a set of interacting arguments and a semantics for evaluating th...
International audienceIn this paper we question the ability of the existant ranking semantics for ar...
The principle of counter-transitivity plays a vital role in argumentation. It states that an argumen...
International audienceGradual semantics with abstract argumentation provide each argument with a sco...