Thanawala S, Shah R, Somepalli V, Alluri KV, Desomayanandam P, Bhuvanendran A. Clin Pharmacol. 2021;13:91–100. The authors have informed the journal that on page 93, Table 2 “Efficacy Endpoints”, for the primary endpoint “Visual analogue scale after 80-m fast-paced walk test”, the parameter “Change from B to D45” is erroneously mentioned as −1.5 ± 0.4 where it should be −1.0 ± 0.4. The correct Table 2 is: On page 96, Table 3 “Biochemical and Inflammatory Markers”, for C-reactive protein, the unit is erroneously mentioned as (mg/dL), where it should be (mg/L). The correct Table 3 is: The authors advise these errors/correctio...
The authors have unfortunately discovered that the originally published version of this article cont...
This is a correction of Biochemia Medica 2018;28(2):020501. DOI: https://doi.org/10.11613/ BM.2018.0...
In the version of this article initially published online, the labels were switched for the right-ha...
Morning and evening efficacy evaluation of rupatadine (10 and 20 mg), compared with cetirizine 10 mg...
The authors would like to draw the readers' attention to an error in the following article: Negrini ...
The authors would like to correct the following errors in the online publication of the article. Inc...
Sofat N, Harrison A, Russell MD, et al. J Pain Res. 2017;10:2437–2449.On page 2443, Table 3, P...
In the original article, there was a mistake in Table 2. Adverse effects and safety risks in phase 3...
The authors regret that the following information was published incorrectly. The errors that need to...
We found two errors in our previous published paper [1]. Figure 4A has a mistake in the units in the...
Zivkovic AR, Bender J, Brenner T, et al. J Inflamm Res.2016;9:221–230.On page 226, Figure 3B a...
The original version of this article unfortunatelȳ contained a mistake. The X-axis labels (‘Favours ...
The authors regret the molar unit is incorrectly displayed on the x-axis in Fig. 4A and 4C and on th...
© 2020 The Author(s) The authors regret that the original version of Fig. 3 incorrect. The updated f...
Following publication of the original article [1], the authors reported an error in Table 2
The authors have unfortunately discovered that the originally published version of this article cont...
This is a correction of Biochemia Medica 2018;28(2):020501. DOI: https://doi.org/10.11613/ BM.2018.0...
In the version of this article initially published online, the labels were switched for the right-ha...
Morning and evening efficacy evaluation of rupatadine (10 and 20 mg), compared with cetirizine 10 mg...
The authors would like to draw the readers' attention to an error in the following article: Negrini ...
The authors would like to correct the following errors in the online publication of the article. Inc...
Sofat N, Harrison A, Russell MD, et al. J Pain Res. 2017;10:2437–2449.On page 2443, Table 3, P...
In the original article, there was a mistake in Table 2. Adverse effects and safety risks in phase 3...
The authors regret that the following information was published incorrectly. The errors that need to...
We found two errors in our previous published paper [1]. Figure 4A has a mistake in the units in the...
Zivkovic AR, Bender J, Brenner T, et al. J Inflamm Res.2016;9:221–230.On page 226, Figure 3B a...
The original version of this article unfortunatelȳ contained a mistake. The X-axis labels (‘Favours ...
The authors regret the molar unit is incorrectly displayed on the x-axis in Fig. 4A and 4C and on th...
© 2020 The Author(s) The authors regret that the original version of Fig. 3 incorrect. The updated f...
Following publication of the original article [1], the authors reported an error in Table 2
The authors have unfortunately discovered that the originally published version of this article cont...
This is a correction of Biochemia Medica 2018;28(2):020501. DOI: https://doi.org/10.11613/ BM.2018.0...
In the version of this article initially published online, the labels were switched for the right-ha...