In this paper, I set out to critically review the impact of Popperian falsificationism and Lakatosian methodology of scientific research programmes [MSRP] on economic methodology and philosophy of economics. The central thesis I maintain is that neither Popper's falsificationism nor Lakatos' MSRP offers [philosophy of] economics a proper condition for the reception or rejection of economic theories
In this paper I employ Imre Lakatos’s methodology of scientific research programs to scrutinize the ...
Lionel Robbins contributions are often discussed in terms of two main aspects. First, the delineatio...
This paper is a consideration of Popper’s criticism of Marxism in terms of the criterion of falsifia...
In this paper, I set out to critically review the impact of Popperian falsificationism and Lakatosia...
Discussions of Karl Popper\u27s falsificationist philosophy of science appear regularly in the recen...
D. Wade Hands is one of the three or four leading figures currently working on economic methodology ...
The purpose of the paper is to evaluate of Imre Lakatos' MSRP (Methodology of Scientific Research Pr...
The `philosophy of science' debates concerning epistemology and methodology are critically appraised...
What is truth? What is knowledge? How can knowledge be identified? How can the growth of knowledge b...
The article offers a re-evaluation of the applicability of Imre Lakatos\u27 methodol...
The work of Imre Lakatos intended to present a refinement to popperian falsificationism approach tha...
Hayek´s methodological outlook at the time he engaged in business cycle research was actually closer...
Terence Hutchison's 1938 essay has been variously interpreted as introducing positivism, ultra-empi...
The book The Popperian Legacy in Economics (editor Neil de Marchi, Cambridge University Press, 1988)...
Ever since the formation of the field of economic methodology in the 1990s, doubts have been raised ...
In this paper I employ Imre Lakatos’s methodology of scientific research programs to scrutinize the ...
Lionel Robbins contributions are often discussed in terms of two main aspects. First, the delineatio...
This paper is a consideration of Popper’s criticism of Marxism in terms of the criterion of falsifia...
In this paper, I set out to critically review the impact of Popperian falsificationism and Lakatosia...
Discussions of Karl Popper\u27s falsificationist philosophy of science appear regularly in the recen...
D. Wade Hands is one of the three or four leading figures currently working on economic methodology ...
The purpose of the paper is to evaluate of Imre Lakatos' MSRP (Methodology of Scientific Research Pr...
The `philosophy of science' debates concerning epistemology and methodology are critically appraised...
What is truth? What is knowledge? How can knowledge be identified? How can the growth of knowledge b...
The article offers a re-evaluation of the applicability of Imre Lakatos\u27 methodol...
The work of Imre Lakatos intended to present a refinement to popperian falsificationism approach tha...
Hayek´s methodological outlook at the time he engaged in business cycle research was actually closer...
Terence Hutchison's 1938 essay has been variously interpreted as introducing positivism, ultra-empi...
The book The Popperian Legacy in Economics (editor Neil de Marchi, Cambridge University Press, 1988)...
Ever since the formation of the field of economic methodology in the 1990s, doubts have been raised ...
In this paper I employ Imre Lakatos’s methodology of scientific research programs to scrutinize the ...
Lionel Robbins contributions are often discussed in terms of two main aspects. First, the delineatio...
This paper is a consideration of Popper’s criticism of Marxism in terms of the criterion of falsifia...