Uncertainty and sensitivity analysis of building-stock energy models : sampling procedure, stock size and Sobol’ convergence

Despite broad recognition of the need for applying Uncertainty (UA) and Sensitivity Analysis (SA) to Building-Stock Energy Models (BSEMs), limited research has been done. This article proposes a scalable methodology to apply UA and SA to BSEMs, with an emphasis on important methodological aspects: input parameter sampling procedure, minimum required building stock size and number of samples needed for convergence. Applying UA and SA to BSEMs requires a two-step input parameter sampling that samples ‘across stocks’ and ‘within stocks’. To make efficient use of computational resources, practitioners should distinguish between three types of convergence: screening, ranking and indices. Nested sampling approaches facilitate comprehensive UA and SA quality checks faster and simpler than non-nested approaches. Robust UA-SA's can be accomplished with relatively limited stock sizes. The article highlights that UA-SA practitioners should only limit the UA-SA scope after very careful consideration as thoughtless curtailments can rapidly affect UA-SA quality and inferences.Despite broad recognition of the need for applying Uncertainty (UA) and Sensitivity Analysis (SA) to Building-Stock Energy Models (BSEMs), limited research has been done. This article proposes a scalable methodology to apply UA and SA to BSEMs, with an emphasis on important methodological aspects: input parameter sampling procedure, minimum required building stock size and number of samples needed for convergence. Applying UA and SA to BSEMs requires a two-step input parameter sampling that samples ‘across stocks’ and ‘within stocks’. To make efficient use of computational resources, practitioners should distinguish between three types of convergence: screening, ranking and indices. Nested sampling approaches facilitate comprehensive UA and SA quality checks faster and simpler than non-nested approaches. Robust UA-SA's can be accomplished with relatively limited stock sizes. The article highlights that UA-SA practitioners should only limit the UA-SA scope after very careful consideration as thoughtless curtailments can rapidly affect UA-SA quality and inferences.A