The Legal Knowledge Interchange Format (LKIF), being developed in the European ESTRELLA project, defines a knowledge representation language for arguments, rules, ontologies, and cases in XML. In this article, the syntax and argumentation-theoretic semantics of the LKIF rule language is presented and illustrated with an example based on German family law. This example is then applied to show how LKIF rules can be used with the Carneades argumentation system to construct, evaluate and visualize arguments about a legal case
Today's argumentation software mostly emphasizes the logical structure of reasoning, and especially ...
Abstract. Typically legal reasoning involves multiple temporal dimensions. The contribution of this ...
Abstract. Various logical representations and frameworks have been proposed for reasoning with legal...
The Legal Knowledge Interchange Format (LKIF) is an XML Schema for representing theories and argumen...
In this paper we describe a legal core ontology that is part of a generic architecture for legal kno...
In this paper we describe a legal core ontology that is part of the Legal Knowledge Interchange Form...
Legal Knowledge Interchange Format (LKIF), being developed under the ESTRELLA project, is a Semantic...
none8This deliverable is included within the activities of Workpackage 3 (WP3) which deals with the ...
The main technical objectives of work package 1 are to develop a first version of a Legal Knowledge ...
This paper investigates how the logical aspects of legal language determine possibilities to attack ...
ABSTRACT Legal ontologies are conceptual models of specific parts of the legal domain. They provide ...
As knowledge representation tools become more sophisticated, and computer systems increase in power ...
Abstract. In this survey paper we summarize the requirements for rule inter-change languages for app...
A knowledge representation language for defeasible legal rules is defined, whose semantics is purely...
Today's argumentation software mostly emphasizes the logical structure of reasoning, and especially ...
Today's argumentation software mostly emphasizes the logical structure of reasoning, and especially ...
Abstract. Typically legal reasoning involves multiple temporal dimensions. The contribution of this ...
Abstract. Various logical representations and frameworks have been proposed for reasoning with legal...
The Legal Knowledge Interchange Format (LKIF) is an XML Schema for representing theories and argumen...
In this paper we describe a legal core ontology that is part of a generic architecture for legal kno...
In this paper we describe a legal core ontology that is part of the Legal Knowledge Interchange Form...
Legal Knowledge Interchange Format (LKIF), being developed under the ESTRELLA project, is a Semantic...
none8This deliverable is included within the activities of Workpackage 3 (WP3) which deals with the ...
The main technical objectives of work package 1 are to develop a first version of a Legal Knowledge ...
This paper investigates how the logical aspects of legal language determine possibilities to attack ...
ABSTRACT Legal ontologies are conceptual models of specific parts of the legal domain. They provide ...
As knowledge representation tools become more sophisticated, and computer systems increase in power ...
Abstract. In this survey paper we summarize the requirements for rule inter-change languages for app...
A knowledge representation language for defeasible legal rules is defined, whose semantics is purely...
Today's argumentation software mostly emphasizes the logical structure of reasoning, and especially ...
Today's argumentation software mostly emphasizes the logical structure of reasoning, and especially ...
Abstract. Typically legal reasoning involves multiple temporal dimensions. The contribution of this ...
Abstract. Various logical representations and frameworks have been proposed for reasoning with legal...