American and French law, like South African law recognises claims for emotional or mental harm. Emotional, mental, or psychological harm was only recognised by the courts in the 1800's and even though the mind and body in a sense is considered as a unit, these types of claims are not on par with claims for physical bodily injury. In fact, these types of claims can be regarded as sui generis but within the broader ambit of delictual or tort liability. Finding delictual or tort liability for emotional, mental or psychological harm has been problematic not only in South Africa but also in the United States of America and France. Even though there are fundamental differences in the law between these jurisdictions, the broader questions the cour...
The distinction between physical and emotional harm is fundamental. Legal disciplines from torts to ...
This dissertation deals with the comparative analysis of mental illness as a defence in criminal law...
Before one can embark on an in depth analysis of the influence of reasonableness on the individual e...
American and French law, like South African law recognises claims for emotional or mental harm. Emot...
Due to a lack of authority in Roman-Dutch law in respect of claims for psychological harm, our court...
In this contribution the influence of reasonableness on the element of conduct in the South African ...
In this contribution the influence of reasonableness on the element of conduct in the South African ...
In this contribution the influence of reasonableness on the element of conduct in the South African ...
Reasonableness as a concept used in determining delictual liability or liability in tort law, is ei...
While the expectancy principle is widely embraced across common law jurisdictions as a foundational ...
When do psychological or emotional harms count as “injury-in-fact” for the purposes of satisfying Ar...
Common law courts have traditionally been reluctant to award damages for emotional harm. This is par...
One of tort law\u27s great failures is its treatment of claims for psychiatric damage (or, to use a ...
More than thirty years ago Prof Hans (PJ) Visser, in one of his earliest publications, mooted the po...
This article examines negligent infliction of emotional distress, one of the most controversial and ...
The distinction between physical and emotional harm is fundamental. Legal disciplines from torts to ...
This dissertation deals with the comparative analysis of mental illness as a defence in criminal law...
Before one can embark on an in depth analysis of the influence of reasonableness on the individual e...
American and French law, like South African law recognises claims for emotional or mental harm. Emot...
Due to a lack of authority in Roman-Dutch law in respect of claims for psychological harm, our court...
In this contribution the influence of reasonableness on the element of conduct in the South African ...
In this contribution the influence of reasonableness on the element of conduct in the South African ...
In this contribution the influence of reasonableness on the element of conduct in the South African ...
Reasonableness as a concept used in determining delictual liability or liability in tort law, is ei...
While the expectancy principle is widely embraced across common law jurisdictions as a foundational ...
When do psychological or emotional harms count as “injury-in-fact” for the purposes of satisfying Ar...
Common law courts have traditionally been reluctant to award damages for emotional harm. This is par...
One of tort law\u27s great failures is its treatment of claims for psychiatric damage (or, to use a ...
More than thirty years ago Prof Hans (PJ) Visser, in one of his earliest publications, mooted the po...
This article examines negligent infliction of emotional distress, one of the most controversial and ...
The distinction between physical and emotional harm is fundamental. Legal disciplines from torts to ...
This dissertation deals with the comparative analysis of mental illness as a defence in criminal law...
Before one can embark on an in depth analysis of the influence of reasonableness on the individual e...