New York, February 1, 2019—Today, Cissy Thunderhawk, Wašté Win Young, the Reverend John Floberg, and José Zhagñay filed their First Amended Complaint in response to state and local defendants’ motions to dismiss. The amended complaint clarifies the civil rights violations caused when defendants closed, to the Tribe and its supporters, the primary road connecting the Standing Rock Reservation to both Bismarck and to numerous public sites of great expressive and religious significance. The plaintiffs are represented by Columbia Law School Lecturer in Law Noah Smith-Drelich and Professor Bernard E. Harcourt through the Columbia Center for Contemporary Critical Thought
Standing Rock Sioux Tribe v US Army Corps of Engineers (Standing Rock V) is the most recent in a ser...
The controversy surrounding the Dakota Access Pipeline (“DAPL”) has put the peaceful plains of North...
Standing Rock Sioux Tribe and Cheyenne River Sioux Tribe v. U.S. Army Corps of Engineers and Dakota ...
New York, February 1, 2019—Today, Cissy Thunderhawk, Wašté Win Young, the Reverend John Floberg, and...
New York, October 26, 2018—Cissy Thunderhawk, Wašté Win Young, and the Reverend John Floberg filed a...
New York, February 15, 2019. Today, state and county defendants in Thunderhawk v. County of Morton e...
New York, September 3, 2020 — In a significant victory for critics of governmental overreach, Judge ...
New York, January 25, 2021 — Advancing yet another step toward trial set for August 2021, the Standi...
New York, October 26, 2020 — Counsel for Standing Rock civil rights plaintiffs are challenging any a...
New York, September 25, 2020 — Judge Daniel M. Traynor (U.S. District Court for North Dakota) has se...
The United States District Court for the District of Columbia partially granted the Standing Rock Si...
New York, February 2, 2021 — Yesterday, the American Civil Liberties Union (ACLU), together with its...
The issue of the Native American (“Indian”) tribes’ rights to their lands started with the applicati...
Standing Rock Sioux Tribe v US Army Corps of Engineers (Standing Rock V) is the most recent in a ser...
The controversy surrounding the Dakota Access Pipeline (“DAPL”) has put the peaceful plains of North...
Standing Rock Sioux Tribe and Cheyenne River Sioux Tribe v. U.S. Army Corps of Engineers and Dakota ...
New York, February 1, 2019—Today, Cissy Thunderhawk, Wašté Win Young, the Reverend John Floberg, and...
New York, October 26, 2018—Cissy Thunderhawk, Wašté Win Young, and the Reverend John Floberg filed a...
New York, February 15, 2019. Today, state and county defendants in Thunderhawk v. County of Morton e...
New York, September 3, 2020 — In a significant victory for critics of governmental overreach, Judge ...
New York, January 25, 2021 — Advancing yet another step toward trial set for August 2021, the Standi...
New York, October 26, 2020 — Counsel for Standing Rock civil rights plaintiffs are challenging any a...
New York, September 25, 2020 — Judge Daniel M. Traynor (U.S. District Court for North Dakota) has se...
The United States District Court for the District of Columbia partially granted the Standing Rock Si...
New York, February 2, 2021 — Yesterday, the American Civil Liberties Union (ACLU), together with its...
The issue of the Native American (“Indian”) tribes’ rights to their lands started with the applicati...
Standing Rock Sioux Tribe v US Army Corps of Engineers (Standing Rock V) is the most recent in a ser...
The controversy surrounding the Dakota Access Pipeline (“DAPL”) has put the peaceful plains of North...
Standing Rock Sioux Tribe and Cheyenne River Sioux Tribe v. U.S. Army Corps of Engineers and Dakota ...