A confidence interval for effect sizes provides a range of plausible population effect sizes (ES) that are consistent with data. This article defines an ES as a standardized linear contrast of means. The noncentral method, Bonett’s method, and the bias-corrected and accelerated bootstrap method are illustrated for constructing the confidence interval for such an effect size. Results obtained from the three methods are discussed and interpretations of results are offered
Effect sizes are the most important outcome of empirical studies. Most articles on effect sizes high...
Effect sizes are the most important outcome of empirical studies. Most articles on effect sizes high...
Educational research continues to come under fire for the perceived lack of rigor, quality and credi...
Confidence intervals must be robust in having nominal and actual probability coverage in close agree...
The coverage performance of the confidence intervals (CIs) for the Root Mean Square Standardized Eff...
Confidence intervals for effect sizes (CIES) provide readers with an estimate of the strength of a r...
The behavioral, educational, and social sciences are undergoing a paradigmatic shift in methodology,...
The psychological and statistical literature contains several proposals for calculating and plotting...
The probability coverage of intervals involving robust estimates of effect size based on seven proce...
It is good scientific practice to the report an appropriate estimate of effect size and a confidence...
A robust Root Mean Square Standardized Effect Size (RMSSER) was developed to address the unsatisfact...
Presenting confidence intervals around means is a common method of expressing uncertainty in data. L...
A framework for comparing normal population means in the presence of heteroscedasticity and outliers...
Effect sizes and confidence intervals are important statistics to assess the magnitude and the preci...
This paper compares the use of confidence intervals (CIs) and a sensitivity analysis called the numb...
Effect sizes are the most important outcome of empirical studies. Most articles on effect sizes high...
Effect sizes are the most important outcome of empirical studies. Most articles on effect sizes high...
Educational research continues to come under fire for the perceived lack of rigor, quality and credi...
Confidence intervals must be robust in having nominal and actual probability coverage in close agree...
The coverage performance of the confidence intervals (CIs) for the Root Mean Square Standardized Eff...
Confidence intervals for effect sizes (CIES) provide readers with an estimate of the strength of a r...
The behavioral, educational, and social sciences are undergoing a paradigmatic shift in methodology,...
The psychological and statistical literature contains several proposals for calculating and plotting...
The probability coverage of intervals involving robust estimates of effect size based on seven proce...
It is good scientific practice to the report an appropriate estimate of effect size and a confidence...
A robust Root Mean Square Standardized Effect Size (RMSSER) was developed to address the unsatisfact...
Presenting confidence intervals around means is a common method of expressing uncertainty in data. L...
A framework for comparing normal population means in the presence of heteroscedasticity and outliers...
Effect sizes and confidence intervals are important statistics to assess the magnitude and the preci...
This paper compares the use of confidence intervals (CIs) and a sensitivity analysis called the numb...
Effect sizes are the most important outcome of empirical studies. Most articles on effect sizes high...
Effect sizes are the most important outcome of empirical studies. Most articles on effect sizes high...
Educational research continues to come under fire for the perceived lack of rigor, quality and credi...