We introduce a new solution concept, called correlated-belief equilibrium. The difference to nash equilibrium is that, while each player has correct marginal conjectures about each opponent, it is not necessarily the case that these marginal conjectures are independent. Then, we provide an epistemic foundation and we relate correlated-belief equilibrium with standard solution concepts, such as rationalizability, correlated equilibrium and conjectural equilibrium
We provide a foundation for correlated rationalizability by means of pairwise epistemic conditions i...
We provide a foundation for correlated rationalizability by means of pairwise epistemic conditions i...
In this paper we investigate the set of correlated equilibria of bimatrix games. These equilibria ar...
We introduce a new solution concept, called correlated-belief equilibrium. The difference to nash eq...
We introduce a new solution concept, called correlated-belief equilibrium. The difference to nash eq...
We introduce a new solution concept, called correlated-belief equilibrium. The difference to nash eq...
We introduce a new solution concept, called correlated-belief equilibrium. The difference to nash eq...
We introduce a new solution concept, called correlated-belief equilibrium. The difference to nash eq...
Nash equilibrium presumes that players have expected utility preferences, and therefore the beliefs ...
We study a model of correlated equilibrium where every player takes actions based on his hierarchies...
We provide a foundation for correlated rationalizability by means of pairwise epistemic conditions i...
We study a model of correlated equilibrium where every player takes actions based on his hierarchies...
We provide a foundation for correlated rationalizability by means of pairwise epistemic conditions i...
We provide a foundation for correlated rationalizability by means of pairwise epistemic conditions i...
We provide a foundation for correlated rationalizability by means of pairwise epistemic conditions i...
We provide a foundation for correlated rationalizability by means of pairwise epistemic conditions i...
We provide a foundation for correlated rationalizability by means of pairwise epistemic conditions i...
In this paper we investigate the set of correlated equilibria of bimatrix games. These equilibria ar...
We introduce a new solution concept, called correlated-belief equilibrium. The difference to nash eq...
We introduce a new solution concept, called correlated-belief equilibrium. The difference to nash eq...
We introduce a new solution concept, called correlated-belief equilibrium. The difference to nash eq...
We introduce a new solution concept, called correlated-belief equilibrium. The difference to nash eq...
We introduce a new solution concept, called correlated-belief equilibrium. The difference to nash eq...
Nash equilibrium presumes that players have expected utility preferences, and therefore the beliefs ...
We study a model of correlated equilibrium where every player takes actions based on his hierarchies...
We provide a foundation for correlated rationalizability by means of pairwise epistemic conditions i...
We study a model of correlated equilibrium where every player takes actions based on his hierarchies...
We provide a foundation for correlated rationalizability by means of pairwise epistemic conditions i...
We provide a foundation for correlated rationalizability by means of pairwise epistemic conditions i...
We provide a foundation for correlated rationalizability by means of pairwise epistemic conditions i...
We provide a foundation for correlated rationalizability by means of pairwise epistemic conditions i...
We provide a foundation for correlated rationalizability by means of pairwise epistemic conditions i...
In this paper we investigate the set of correlated equilibria of bimatrix games. These equilibria ar...