This paper extends the analysis of liberal principles in social choice recently proposed by mariotti and veneziani (2009a) to infinitely-lived societies. First, some novel characterisations of inegalitarian leximax social welfare relations are derived based on the individual benefit principle (ibp), which incorporates a liberal, non-interfering view of society. This is surprising because the ibp does not explicitly incorporate any preference for inequality, nor does it assign priority to well-off members of society. Second, some impossibility results are derived that highlight a general tension between standard fairness and efficiency axioms in social choice, and a liberal principle of non-interference that generalises ibp
When well-being is one-dimensional, the key ethical issue for the definition of social welfare is th...
This paper reviews Amartya Sen's well-known result on 'the impossibility of a Paretian liberal'. In ...
It has become accepted that social choice is impossible in the absence of interpersonal comparisons ...
This paper extends the analysis of liberal principles in social choice recently proposed by Mariotti...
This paper extends the analysis of liberal principles in social choice recently proposed by mariotti...
This paper extends the analysis of liberal principles in social choice recently proposed by Mariotti...
We analyse the liberal ethics of non-interference applied to social choice. Two liberal principles c...
We analyse the liberal ethics of non-interference applied to social choice. A liberal principle capt...
In a series of recent papers a number of economists and philosophers have been wrestling with the ag...
This paper analyses the implications of classical liberal and libertarian approaches for dis-tributi...
It has become accepted that social choice is impossible in absence of interpersonal comparisons of w...
In a standard framework of choice theory, we formulate two contrasting principles for social choice ...
We analyse the implications of classical liberal and libertarian approaches for distributive justice...
It has become accepted that social choice is impossible in absence of interpersonal comparisons of w...
When well-being is one-dimensional, the key ethical issue for the definition of social welfare is th...
This paper reviews Amartya Sen's well-known result on 'the impossibility of a Paretian liberal'. In ...
It has become accepted that social choice is impossible in the absence of interpersonal comparisons ...
This paper extends the analysis of liberal principles in social choice recently proposed by Mariotti...
This paper extends the analysis of liberal principles in social choice recently proposed by mariotti...
This paper extends the analysis of liberal principles in social choice recently proposed by Mariotti...
We analyse the liberal ethics of non-interference applied to social choice. Two liberal principles c...
We analyse the liberal ethics of non-interference applied to social choice. A liberal principle capt...
In a series of recent papers a number of economists and philosophers have been wrestling with the ag...
This paper analyses the implications of classical liberal and libertarian approaches for dis-tributi...
It has become accepted that social choice is impossible in absence of interpersonal comparisons of w...
In a standard framework of choice theory, we formulate two contrasting principles for social choice ...
We analyse the implications of classical liberal and libertarian approaches for distributive justice...
It has become accepted that social choice is impossible in absence of interpersonal comparisons of w...
When well-being is one-dimensional, the key ethical issue for the definition of social welfare is th...
This paper reviews Amartya Sen's well-known result on 'the impossibility of a Paretian liberal'. In ...
It has become accepted that social choice is impossible in the absence of interpersonal comparisons ...