Evaluation of Different Laser-Supported Surgical Protocols for the Treatment of Oral Leukoplakia: A Long-Term Follow-Up.

peer reviewed[en] PURPOSE: The aim of this study was to evaluate the long-term success rate of oral leukoplakia treatments by using different laser-supported surgical protocols. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Overall, 2347 diagnosed homogeneous oral leukoplakias were treated with CO2 laser and were included in this study. Different surgical protocols (P) were used: P1 (SV = superficial scanning) was a complete superficial vaporization of the leukoplakia by a scanning mode in two passages respecting an overlapping. Only the visible white area was treated in one surgical session independently of the lesion size. P2 (CR1x1) was a complete excision of the lesions until a tissular depth of 1 mm and 1 mm of surrounding healthy-like tissue were attained. The visible white area was treated in one surgical session independently of the lesion size. P3 (CR1x3) was a complete excision of the lesions until a minimum tissue depth of 1 mm and 3 mm of surrounding healthy-like tissue were obtained. The visible white area was treated in one surgical session independently of the lesion size. P4 (PR1x3) was similar to the third one, but for patient comfort, the large lesions of leukoplakias (lesion size higher than 20 mm), the complete surgical excision of the leukoplakia was performed in multiple sessions that were spaced by 1 month (partial surgical removal of 10 mm per session). All patients were recalled at 2 and 8 weeks after surgery, and then every 2 months during the first year, every 4 months during the second year, and once a year for the follow-up period of 6 years. A biopsy was done once a year during the follow-up period in the surgical site when needed. The control consisted of checking the nature and the aspect of the healed mucosa to exclude an eventual recurrence of leukoplakia. RESULTS: The percentage of permanent success after 6 years of follow-up was 5.7%, 69.7%, 97.8%, and 71.9%, respectively, for the first surgical protocol (SV), the second (CR 1 × 1), the third (CR 1 × 3), and the fourth (PR 1 × 3). The appearance of malignant transformation after laser treatment (during the follow-up period of 6 years) was 20%, 1%, and 0.2%, respectively, for the groups treated by the following protocols: 1 (SV), 2 (CR 1 × 1), and 4 (PR 1 × 3). Only in the third group CR1x3, no dysplasia or malignant transformation was noted. On the contrary, the appearance of malignant transformation in failed treated cases was 21.21% for the protocol 1 (SV), 3% for the protocol 2 (CR 1 × 1), and 0.6% for the protocol 4 (PR 1 × 3). CONCLUSIONS: The results of this long-term follow-up of treated patients with oral homogeneous leukoplakias pointed out that the surgical laser protocol respecting the complete excision of leukoplakias, in one session, by the removal of a minimum of 1 mm in lesion depth and 3 mm of surrounding healthy-like tissues (CR 1 × 3) offers significantly the highest success rate