The reliability and validity of the application of legal criteria for commitment were investigated as part of a larger study. Evaluations of 411 patients by 96 different clinicians showed good interrater reliability for assessment of dangerousness and committability. A strong relationship between ratings of committability and ratings of dangerousness suggests that clinicians were conforming to the logic of the commitment law. Discrepant cases involved patients who desired voluntary admission or whose commitment was completed elsewhere. Results suggest fair application of commitment standards but that two issues of statutory interpretation confused participating clinicians
Background Involuntary admission (IA) for psychiatric treatment is a massive restriction of human r...
In one of its most controversial decisions to date, United States v Comstock, the Roberts Court uphe...
This paper examines the role of credible commitment in facilitating long-term decision making in hea...
A study at a large urban psychiatric hospital in Pennsylvania evaluated whether the state\u27s dange...
The shift to dangerousness-oriented civil commitment criteria has led to speculation that mentally i...
interpreted to assert that dangerousness is a constitutional requirement for civil commitment. This ...
Placement in a mental health facility may be made through either a voluntary or involuntary commitme...
A reliable prototype index, Three Ratings of Involuntary Admissibility (TRIAD), was developed to ref...
The authors developed Three Ratings of Involuntary Admissibility (TRIAD) to reflect the way clinicia...
BACKGROUND: Psychiatric commitment laws have been reformed in many European countries. We assessed t...
The imposition of substantive and procedural protections in the civil commitment process thirty year...
This article presents results of a national survey of psychiatrists in the United States about invol...
The current debate over the “police powers” versus parens patniae rationales for involuntary hospita...
Nebraska\u27s procedures for the civil commitment of the mentally ill are lacking in protections for...
The authors examine the emergency commitment process in one Oregon county and present data that docu...
Background Involuntary admission (IA) for psychiatric treatment is a massive restriction of human r...
In one of its most controversial decisions to date, United States v Comstock, the Roberts Court uphe...
This paper examines the role of credible commitment in facilitating long-term decision making in hea...
A study at a large urban psychiatric hospital in Pennsylvania evaluated whether the state\u27s dange...
The shift to dangerousness-oriented civil commitment criteria has led to speculation that mentally i...
interpreted to assert that dangerousness is a constitutional requirement for civil commitment. This ...
Placement in a mental health facility may be made through either a voluntary or involuntary commitme...
A reliable prototype index, Three Ratings of Involuntary Admissibility (TRIAD), was developed to ref...
The authors developed Three Ratings of Involuntary Admissibility (TRIAD) to reflect the way clinicia...
BACKGROUND: Psychiatric commitment laws have been reformed in many European countries. We assessed t...
The imposition of substantive and procedural protections in the civil commitment process thirty year...
This article presents results of a national survey of psychiatrists in the United States about invol...
The current debate over the “police powers” versus parens patniae rationales for involuntary hospita...
Nebraska\u27s procedures for the civil commitment of the mentally ill are lacking in protections for...
The authors examine the emergency commitment process in one Oregon county and present data that docu...
Background Involuntary admission (IA) for psychiatric treatment is a massive restriction of human r...
In one of its most controversial decisions to date, United States v Comstock, the Roberts Court uphe...
This paper examines the role of credible commitment in facilitating long-term decision making in hea...