Thermal comfort of novel low-momentum ventilation concepts for passengers in long-distance trains

Thermal comfort is essential to increase the modal share of rail transport by attracting more passengers. In this study, three novel low-momentum ventilation concepts were analyzed regarding the thermal comfort of railway passengers and compared to a conventional ventilation setting. Using an experimental approach, objective measurements of climate parameters and subjective assessments from 146 test subjects in a generic train compartment were analyzed. Results revealed significant differences in perceived thermal comfort among the four ventilation settings. Subjects reported comparatively higher thermal comfort in hatrack integrated low-momentum ventilation and hybrid ventilation (HV) than in cabin displacement ventilation (CDV) and microjet ventilation (MJV). Vertical temperature stratification was strongest in CDV, leading to losses in the comfort of the lower body parts. In MJV, some temporary and local exceedances of air velocities were observed, which contributed to lower comfort evaluations at heads and shoulders. For all ventilation settings, warmer air temperatures were preferred. Our findings demonstrated that subjective comfort assessments reasonably complement earlier results derived from thermal manikin studies. Therefore, low-momentum ventilation, especially in terms of HV, has the significant potential to improve thermal conditions for long-distance journeys in passenger rail cars