In figure 2, a typo of 'MES > 500 m' was introduced to the third y-axis label from the top when edited to meet house style. This label has been corrected to 'MES < 500 m' in the updated version of figure 2, below. (Figure presented)
© 2017, Springer Science+Business Media B.V., part of Springer Nature. In Table 2 of the original pu...
Correction for ‘The global technical and economic potential of bioenergy from salt-affected soils’ b...
The authors regret an error in the Fig. 2(d) caption. The text "U=1.3 V" in the published version sh...
Williamson G, Tamburrino G, Bizior A, Boeckstaens M, Mirandela GD, Bage MG, Pisliakov A, Ives CM, Te...
We found two errors in our previous published paper [1]. Figure 4A has a mistake in the units in the...
In the original article, there was a mistake in the legend for Table S-3 as published. Units were no...
In the original version of this article, when equations were referenced within the main text, the nu...
There is an error in Fig. 4, “Oxygen (O2) concentration (mg L −1) profile per mm of both sedi-ments ...
In the original version of this Article, the legends to Figures 1, 2, 3, and 4 were inadvertently sw...
Contains fulltext : 144068.pdf (publisher's version ) (Open Access)1 p
The authors regret that in the original version, the y-axes of Figures 5 and 8 were labelled incorre...
The unit of the average transmembrane flux ([Formula presented]) in the legends of the graphs shown ...
There are two instances of an error in Edson et al. (2013). In both the abstract (p. 1589), and in s...
This is the final version. Available from The Royal Society via the DOI in this record. All original...
Page 8372 in section 2.3. ORR Kinetics. There is an error in the sentence "The effective surface of ...
© 2017, Springer Science+Business Media B.V., part of Springer Nature. In Table 2 of the original pu...
Correction for ‘The global technical and economic potential of bioenergy from salt-affected soils’ b...
The authors regret an error in the Fig. 2(d) caption. The text "U=1.3 V" in the published version sh...
Williamson G, Tamburrino G, Bizior A, Boeckstaens M, Mirandela GD, Bage MG, Pisliakov A, Ives CM, Te...
We found two errors in our previous published paper [1]. Figure 4A has a mistake in the units in the...
In the original article, there was a mistake in the legend for Table S-3 as published. Units were no...
In the original version of this article, when equations were referenced within the main text, the nu...
There is an error in Fig. 4, “Oxygen (O2) concentration (mg L −1) profile per mm of both sedi-ments ...
In the original version of this Article, the legends to Figures 1, 2, 3, and 4 were inadvertently sw...
Contains fulltext : 144068.pdf (publisher's version ) (Open Access)1 p
The authors regret that in the original version, the y-axes of Figures 5 and 8 were labelled incorre...
The unit of the average transmembrane flux ([Formula presented]) in the legends of the graphs shown ...
There are two instances of an error in Edson et al. (2013). In both the abstract (p. 1589), and in s...
This is the final version. Available from The Royal Society via the DOI in this record. All original...
Page 8372 in section 2.3. ORR Kinetics. There is an error in the sentence "The effective surface of ...
© 2017, Springer Science+Business Media B.V., part of Springer Nature. In Table 2 of the original pu...
Correction for ‘The global technical and economic potential of bioenergy from salt-affected soils’ b...
The authors regret an error in the Fig. 2(d) caption. The text "U=1.3 V" in the published version sh...