Add to ORKGExamines the ethical and professionalism issues that arise in the context of judicial elections. The panelists will discuss and evaluate the efficacy of the various models of judicial elections, as well as the ethical challenges presented by campaigning and campaign finance. In addition, the panel will consider the potential effect of the election process on judicial decision-making, including possible influence on actual outcomes and the necessity for recusal. Special attention given to recent judicial elections in Florida, Iowa, and Wisconsin
Although 89% of state judges (appellate and general-jurisdiction trial judges) face some type of e...
The Symposium entitled Judicial Professionalism in a New Era of Judicial Selection, held on Octobe...
Election season is within sight again, and with it come the obligatory attacks on the judiciary. Som...
Examines the ethical and professionalism issues that arise in the context of judicial elections. The...
In the United States today the vast majority of states conduct elections in some form or fashion to ...
Regulating Judicial Elections provides the first accounting of the efficacy and consequences of such...
Proponents of judicial elections and related campaign activities emphasize existing First Amendment ...
Empirical data show that, despite the significant electoral success of state court judges, elections...
Elections transform the basis of judicial legitimacy. Whereas a permanently appointed judiciary find...
Judges often admonish lawyers for behaving in uncivil or unprofessional ways towards one another. Th...
Judges often admonish lawyers for behaving in uncivil or unprofessional ways towards one another. Th...
Judicial elections in the United States have undergone a dramatic transformation. For more than a ce...
The vast majority of judicial offices in the United States are subject to election. The votes of the...
In its cases dealing with judicial elections, the Court has cycled back and forth over whether to tr...
This thesis examines campaign contributions in judicial elections. Increasing campaign costs have cr...
Although 89% of state judges (appellate and general-jurisdiction trial judges) face some type of e...
The Symposium entitled Judicial Professionalism in a New Era of Judicial Selection, held on Octobe...
Election season is within sight again, and with it come the obligatory attacks on the judiciary. Som...
Examines the ethical and professionalism issues that arise in the context of judicial elections. The...
In the United States today the vast majority of states conduct elections in some form or fashion to ...
Regulating Judicial Elections provides the first accounting of the efficacy and consequences of such...
Proponents of judicial elections and related campaign activities emphasize existing First Amendment ...
Empirical data show that, despite the significant electoral success of state court judges, elections...
Elections transform the basis of judicial legitimacy. Whereas a permanently appointed judiciary find...
Judges often admonish lawyers for behaving in uncivil or unprofessional ways towards one another. Th...
Judges often admonish lawyers for behaving in uncivil or unprofessional ways towards one another. Th...
Judicial elections in the United States have undergone a dramatic transformation. For more than a ce...
The vast majority of judicial offices in the United States are subject to election. The votes of the...
In its cases dealing with judicial elections, the Court has cycled back and forth over whether to tr...
This thesis examines campaign contributions in judicial elections. Increasing campaign costs have cr...
Although 89% of state judges (appellate and general-jurisdiction trial judges) face some type of e...
The Symposium entitled Judicial Professionalism in a New Era of Judicial Selection, held on Octobe...
Election season is within sight again, and with it come the obligatory attacks on the judiciary. Som...