Seventy years ago the Georgia Court of Appeals decided the case of Underwood v. State, 13 Ga. App. 206, 78 S. E. 1103 (1913). The facts of the Underwood case were dramatic but simple. Suspecting that the defendant Underwood was selling liquor in violation of the state\u27s prohibition law, Americus police went to Underwood\u27s store and illegally searched the premises without a warrant; they arrested Underwood and took him to the police barracks illegally and without a warrant; they forcibly and against his will seized certain keys from Underwood\u27s person; and they then returned to the store where using the keys they opened Underwood\u27s safe and found 114 pints of whiskey. Thereafter Underwood was tried and convicted, the principal ev...
The purpose of this Article is to examine the problem of use in federal court of evidence illegally ...
Two federal narcotic officers accompanied by two state officers went into the defendant\u27s residen...
At common law, illegally seized evidence was admissible on the theory that the nature of the seizure...
Seventy years ago the Georgia Court of Appeals decided the case of Underwood v. State, 13 Ga. App. 2...
This Note examines the Supreme Court\u27s conflicting policies and how the Underwood court resolved ...
No knock search warrants are issued frequently in Georgia nowadays, and such warrants have simply b...
After the Georgia Supreme Court’s rulings in Olevik v. State and Elliott v. State, Georgia’s DUI Imp...
The most important step in the development of this constitutional provision came in 1886 in the famo...
Defendants were prosecuted and convicted of conspiring to engage in horserace bookmaking and related...
Petitioner was convicted of bookmaking under the anti-gambling laws of California by the use of evid...
On February 15, 1960, the Louisiana Supreme Court affirmed petitioner\u27s conviction for simple bur...
Appellant was indicted under a Georgia statute which provided that anyone who contracted to perform ...
Introducing Evidence Obtained by an Illegal Search and Seizure for Impeachment Purposes. Commonwealt...
This article argues that the Supreme Court\u27s original view of the history and meaning of the four...
The United States Supreme Court has held that a search warrant based on information from an anonymou...
The purpose of this Article is to examine the problem of use in federal court of evidence illegally ...
Two federal narcotic officers accompanied by two state officers went into the defendant\u27s residen...
At common law, illegally seized evidence was admissible on the theory that the nature of the seizure...
Seventy years ago the Georgia Court of Appeals decided the case of Underwood v. State, 13 Ga. App. 2...
This Note examines the Supreme Court\u27s conflicting policies and how the Underwood court resolved ...
No knock search warrants are issued frequently in Georgia nowadays, and such warrants have simply b...
After the Georgia Supreme Court’s rulings in Olevik v. State and Elliott v. State, Georgia’s DUI Imp...
The most important step in the development of this constitutional provision came in 1886 in the famo...
Defendants were prosecuted and convicted of conspiring to engage in horserace bookmaking and related...
Petitioner was convicted of bookmaking under the anti-gambling laws of California by the use of evid...
On February 15, 1960, the Louisiana Supreme Court affirmed petitioner\u27s conviction for simple bur...
Appellant was indicted under a Georgia statute which provided that anyone who contracted to perform ...
Introducing Evidence Obtained by an Illegal Search and Seizure for Impeachment Purposes. Commonwealt...
This article argues that the Supreme Court\u27s original view of the history and meaning of the four...
The United States Supreme Court has held that a search warrant based on information from an anonymou...
The purpose of this Article is to examine the problem of use in federal court of evidence illegally ...
Two federal narcotic officers accompanied by two state officers went into the defendant\u27s residen...
At common law, illegally seized evidence was admissible on the theory that the nature of the seizure...