October 9, 2003 Media Advisory LECTURE TO FOCUS ON THE IMPLICATIONS OF THE LAWRENCE V. TEXAS SUPREME COURT RULING Athens, Ga. - Attorney Paul Smith, who argued the winning side of Lawrence v. Texas before the U.S. Supreme Court, will discuss his experience and the broader implications of the homosexual sodomy case. In the 6-3 Supreme Court ruling this summer, the Texas statute outlawing same-sex sodomy was deemed unconstitutional. In addition, a 5-4 majority of the court, led by Justice Anthony Kennedy, went further and overturned the 1986 decision of Bowers v. Hardwick, which upheld a Georgia sodomy statute applicable to both homosexual and heterosexual couples. The lecture will begin at 11 a.m. tomorrow, October 10, in the University of...
At an April 6 event co-sponsored by the Diversity and Inclusion Advisory Council, the Black Law Stud...
The Lawrence decision is one of the most momentous pro-individual rights decisions ever adjudicated ...
This article addresses the Supreme Court\u27s 2003 decision in Lawrence v. Texas and its implication...
October 9, 2003 Media Advisory LECTURE TO FOCUS ON THE IMPLICATIONS OF THE LAWRENCE V. TEXAS SUPREME...
This chapter is about the Supreme Court learning what it means to be gay. This happened between the ...
Noah\u27s Curse and Paul\u27s Admonition: Civil Rights, Religious Liberty, Gay Equality is the titl...
Writer/Contact: Cindy H. Rice, 706/542-5172, cindyh@uga.edu Athens, Ga. – Noah\u27s Curse and Paul\...
Will Supreme Court nationalize same-sex marriage? UGA experts will look for clues in oral arguments ...
Discusses the Supreme Court decision Lawrence v. Texas, 123 S. Ct. 24 72 (2003). Writing for the maj...
For many centuries, homosexual behavior has been viewed differently by many cultures. The Greeks and...
The lesbian and gay communities have reacted to the Supreme Court\u27s decision in Lawrence v. Texas...
The lecture was delivered on 16 March 2016.In the decades before the United States Supreme Court rec...
This report provides an overview of the Supreme Court's opinion in Lawrence v. Texas, coupled with a...
Thursday, March 17, 2005 WRITER: Julie Camp, 706/542-5172, lawcomm@uga.edu CONTACT: Heidi Murphy, 70...
The struggle over civil rights has a long history in the United States and it still continues today....
At an April 6 event co-sponsored by the Diversity and Inclusion Advisory Council, the Black Law Stud...
The Lawrence decision is one of the most momentous pro-individual rights decisions ever adjudicated ...
This article addresses the Supreme Court\u27s 2003 decision in Lawrence v. Texas and its implication...
October 9, 2003 Media Advisory LECTURE TO FOCUS ON THE IMPLICATIONS OF THE LAWRENCE V. TEXAS SUPREME...
This chapter is about the Supreme Court learning what it means to be gay. This happened between the ...
Noah\u27s Curse and Paul\u27s Admonition: Civil Rights, Religious Liberty, Gay Equality is the titl...
Writer/Contact: Cindy H. Rice, 706/542-5172, cindyh@uga.edu Athens, Ga. – Noah\u27s Curse and Paul\...
Will Supreme Court nationalize same-sex marriage? UGA experts will look for clues in oral arguments ...
Discusses the Supreme Court decision Lawrence v. Texas, 123 S. Ct. 24 72 (2003). Writing for the maj...
For many centuries, homosexual behavior has been viewed differently by many cultures. The Greeks and...
The lesbian and gay communities have reacted to the Supreme Court\u27s decision in Lawrence v. Texas...
The lecture was delivered on 16 March 2016.In the decades before the United States Supreme Court rec...
This report provides an overview of the Supreme Court's opinion in Lawrence v. Texas, coupled with a...
Thursday, March 17, 2005 WRITER: Julie Camp, 706/542-5172, lawcomm@uga.edu CONTACT: Heidi Murphy, 70...
The struggle over civil rights has a long history in the United States and it still continues today....
At an April 6 event co-sponsored by the Diversity and Inclusion Advisory Council, the Black Law Stud...
The Lawrence decision is one of the most momentous pro-individual rights decisions ever adjudicated ...
This article addresses the Supreme Court\u27s 2003 decision in Lawrence v. Texas and its implication...