The question whether or not the massacres of Armenians in 1915 were a genocide is hotly debated between Armenian and Turkish historians. A great deal of controversy is related to the trustworthiness of Ottoman/Turkish, Armenian and Entente-power sources. This article investigates whether sources from a neutral country in the First World War - the Netherlands - can help to clarify this matter and comes to the conclusion that these sources seem to corroberate the notion of an Armenian genocide, but also that these Dutch sources are not beyond reproach themselves and are too scarce to make such a judgement
In April 2015 the centenary of the Armenian Genocide was commemorated. Just like the First World War...
Is the Armenian Genocide a strictly historical matter? If that is the case, why is it still a topica...
This peer-reviewed book features essays on the Armenian massacres of 1915-1916. It aims to cast ligh...
The question whether or not the massacres of Armenians in 1915 were a genocide is hotly debated betw...
The question whether or not the massacres of Armenians in 1915 were a genocide is hotly debated betw...
This study depicts how the Armenian massacres in the Ottoman Empire during World War I were perceive...
This study depicts how the Armenian massacres in the Ottoman Empire during World War I were perceive...
This article evaluates the presence of framing mechanisms in Dutch media reporting on the Second Kar...
Hilmar Kaiser, one of the first German historians to work on the Armenian Genocide and one who has o...
The Armenian Genocide left behind a plethora of unexamined information in the language of the victi...
No abstractThis article explores the political reasoning behind the recognition or non-recognition o...
The article recalls how in 2015, the year of the centenary of the Armenian Genocide, important publi...
The author analyzes the Ottoman Archives as a source of information on the Armenian Genocide of 1915...
This article probes the place of Armenia and (Ottoman) Armenians in the Belgian imagination in the l...
The main source of animosity in modern Turkish–Armenian relations is the debate on the international...
In April 2015 the centenary of the Armenian Genocide was commemorated. Just like the First World War...
Is the Armenian Genocide a strictly historical matter? If that is the case, why is it still a topica...
This peer-reviewed book features essays on the Armenian massacres of 1915-1916. It aims to cast ligh...
The question whether or not the massacres of Armenians in 1915 were a genocide is hotly debated betw...
The question whether or not the massacres of Armenians in 1915 were a genocide is hotly debated betw...
This study depicts how the Armenian massacres in the Ottoman Empire during World War I were perceive...
This study depicts how the Armenian massacres in the Ottoman Empire during World War I were perceive...
This article evaluates the presence of framing mechanisms in Dutch media reporting on the Second Kar...
Hilmar Kaiser, one of the first German historians to work on the Armenian Genocide and one who has o...
The Armenian Genocide left behind a plethora of unexamined information in the language of the victi...
No abstractThis article explores the political reasoning behind the recognition or non-recognition o...
The article recalls how in 2015, the year of the centenary of the Armenian Genocide, important publi...
The author analyzes the Ottoman Archives as a source of information on the Armenian Genocide of 1915...
This article probes the place of Armenia and (Ottoman) Armenians in the Belgian imagination in the l...
The main source of animosity in modern Turkish–Armenian relations is the debate on the international...
In April 2015 the centenary of the Armenian Genocide was commemorated. Just like the First World War...
Is the Armenian Genocide a strictly historical matter? If that is the case, why is it still a topica...
This peer-reviewed book features essays on the Armenian massacres of 1915-1916. It aims to cast ligh...