Based on a comparative study of two alliances, this paper provides an in-depth examination of the role of interpartner dissimilarities in Industry-University (IU) alliances. We make a conceptual distinction between routine-based dissimilarities (differences in partners' behavior) and orientation-based dissimilarities (differences in partners' goals and expectations), illuminating their joint implications for collaborative processes and outcomes over time. Our findings reveal that interpartner dissimilarities might not be problematic at the start-up or honeymoon stage in IU alliances. In the post-formation alliance stages, however, they are likely to complicate the collaboration. Orientation-based dissimilarities might frustrate partners' at...
We explore heterogeneities in the determinants of innovating firms' decisions to engage in r&d c...
This paper is concerned with the role that membership structures of inter-organizational collaborati...
This electronic version is made publicly available by the University of Adelaide in accordance with ...
Based on a comparative study of two alliances, this paper provides an in-depth examination of the ro...
Based on a comparative study of two alliances, this paper provides an in-depth examination of the ro...
Industry-university (IU) alliances are often subject to tensions caused by the dissimilarities betwe...
Careful partner selection is a prerequisite for successful alliances. I posit that institutional dis...
Some case studies have recently advanced our understanding of university-industry partnerships, show...
In order to overcome competitive challenges, firms increasingly ally, including jointly performing R...
Power asymmetry exists in almost all multi-partner alliances. Literature on interpersonal teams sugg...
The evolution in the business environment of the last thirty years has brought with it a transformat...
An important reason for forming technological alliances is to learn from partners. In choosing partn...
Despite the common belief that orientation asymmetry—fundamental differences in the goals and expect...
This article reports the results of an empirical study focusing on the relationship between the rela...
We explore heterogeneities in the determinants of innovating firms' decisions to engage in r&d c...
This paper is concerned with the role that membership structures of inter-organizational collaborati...
This electronic version is made publicly available by the University of Adelaide in accordance with ...
Based on a comparative study of two alliances, this paper provides an in-depth examination of the ro...
Based on a comparative study of two alliances, this paper provides an in-depth examination of the ro...
Industry-university (IU) alliances are often subject to tensions caused by the dissimilarities betwe...
Careful partner selection is a prerequisite for successful alliances. I posit that institutional dis...
Some case studies have recently advanced our understanding of university-industry partnerships, show...
In order to overcome competitive challenges, firms increasingly ally, including jointly performing R...
Power asymmetry exists in almost all multi-partner alliances. Literature on interpersonal teams sugg...
The evolution in the business environment of the last thirty years has brought with it a transformat...
An important reason for forming technological alliances is to learn from partners. In choosing partn...
Despite the common belief that orientation asymmetry—fundamental differences in the goals and expect...
This article reports the results of an empirical study focusing on the relationship between the rela...
We explore heterogeneities in the determinants of innovating firms' decisions to engage in r&d c...
This paper is concerned with the role that membership structures of inter-organizational collaborati...
This electronic version is made publicly available by the University of Adelaide in accordance with ...