Spontaneous reports of thromboembolic events associated with cyproterone/ethinylestradiol after media attention

Background: After extensive media attention on thromboembolic adverse drug reactions (TE-ADRs) and the use of cyproterone/ethinylestradiol (CE), the Netherlands Pharmacovigilance Centre Lareb received a high number of reports about this association, which prompted for detailed analyses. Objectives: To analyse reports of thromboembolic events associated with the use of cyproterone/ ethinylestradiol submitted to Lareb, focusing on the indication of use, presence of risk factors and time between the initial symptoms and the actual diagnosis of the TE. Methods: Reports submitted to Lareb till 11 February 2014 were analysed. The analysis was focussed on reporter type, seriousness of the reaction, age of the patient, BMI, indication, ADRs classified as arterial thrombosis and venous thrombosis, pulmonary embolism, latency period, outcome of the reaction, treatment of the ADR, delay between the first symptoms and diagnosis of the ADR, presence of risk factors. Results: On 11 February 2014, Lareb had received a total of 786 reports about CE, including 41 cases with a fatal outcome. Of all reports, 438 reports considered TE-ADRs which were analysed in more detail. Reported ADRs consisted of arterial thrombosis (N = 74), venous thrombosis (N = 63), pulmonary embolism (N = 219) and thrombosis with an unspecified location (N = 172). Patient's mean age was 30.5 years (range 14-57 years). The primary indications for use were acne (N = 193), oral contraceptive (N = 181), hirsutism (N = 13), other (N = 18) or the indication was unknown (N = 33). The median time to onset was 4 years, although many patients reported a longer latency period. There was no distinction between the time of onset in respect to the reported ADR. No differences in risk factors seem to exist between labeled and off-label indications. In 382 out of 438 reports (87%), the reporter was a consumer. Some reports mentioned the fact that thrombosis or embolism were not recognized in an early stage. Conclusions: The reported thromboembolic ADRs are a known risk related to the use of CE, but may be misdiagnosed initially. From the reports that Lareb received it is evident that off-label use is frequent