In recent years, the combinatorics of argumentation with arguments that can attack each other has been studied extensively. Especially, attack graphs (put in the focus of attention by Dung's seminal work 1995) have proven to be a productive tool of analysis. In this paper a new style of algorithm is presented that computes the minimal admissible sets containing or attacking the argument. It is a breadth-first algorithm using labelings. The algorithm is applied to the computation of the preferred and stable extensions of a given attack graph.</p
We consider argumentation systems taking into account several attack relations of different strength...
An argumentation framework is seen as a directed graph whose nodes are arguments and arcs are attack...
AbstractOne difficulty that arises in abstract argument systems is that many natural questions regar...
In recent years, the combinatorics of argumentation with arguments that can attack each other has be...
The hitherto most abstract, and hence general, argumentation system, is the one described by Dung in...
An argumentation framework is a pair made of a graph and a semantics. The nodes and the edges of the...
International audienceAn argumentation framework is a pair made of a graph and a semantics. The node...
Argumentation frameworks have to be evaluated with respect to argumentation semantics to compute the...
One difficulty that arises in abstract argument systems is that many natural questions regarding arg...
National audienceThe paper studies how arguments can be evaluated in weighted bipolar argumentation ...
International audienceThe paper tackled the issue of arguments evaluation in weighted bipo-lar argum...
Argumentation is a process of evaluating and comparing sets of arguments. Ranking-based semantics re...
Abstract. Extended Argumentation Frameworks (EAFs) are a recently proposed formalism that develop ab...
International audienceThe paper tackled the issue of arguments evaluation in weighted bipolar argume...
In this paper we are interested in the role of preferences in argumentation theory. To promote a hig...
We consider argumentation systems taking into account several attack relations of different strength...
An argumentation framework is seen as a directed graph whose nodes are arguments and arcs are attack...
AbstractOne difficulty that arises in abstract argument systems is that many natural questions regar...
In recent years, the combinatorics of argumentation with arguments that can attack each other has be...
The hitherto most abstract, and hence general, argumentation system, is the one described by Dung in...
An argumentation framework is a pair made of a graph and a semantics. The nodes and the edges of the...
International audienceAn argumentation framework is a pair made of a graph and a semantics. The node...
Argumentation frameworks have to be evaluated with respect to argumentation semantics to compute the...
One difficulty that arises in abstract argument systems is that many natural questions regarding arg...
National audienceThe paper studies how arguments can be evaluated in weighted bipolar argumentation ...
International audienceThe paper tackled the issue of arguments evaluation in weighted bipo-lar argum...
Argumentation is a process of evaluating and comparing sets of arguments. Ranking-based semantics re...
Abstract. Extended Argumentation Frameworks (EAFs) are a recently proposed formalism that develop ab...
International audienceThe paper tackled the issue of arguments evaluation in weighted bipolar argume...
In this paper we are interested in the role of preferences in argumentation theory. To promote a hig...
We consider argumentation systems taking into account several attack relations of different strength...
An argumentation framework is seen as a directed graph whose nodes are arguments and arcs are attack...
AbstractOne difficulty that arises in abstract argument systems is that many natural questions regar...