Performance comparison of virtual cellular manufacturing with functional and cellular layouts in DRC settings

This study investigates the performance of virtual cellular manufacturing (VCM) systems, comparing them with functional layouts (FL) and traditional, physical cellular layout (CL), in a dual-resource-constrained (DRC) system context. VCM systems employ logical cells, retaining the process layouts of job shops. Part family-based scheduling rules are applied to exploit the benefits of group technology while retaining the flexibility and functional synergies of the job shop. Past studies of VCM have been based entirely on single-resource-constrained (SRC) systems, i.e. as purely machine-limited systems, assuming that resources such as tabour and tooling do not restrict the output. However, given the fact that tabour forms a second major constraining resource, and many of the advantages associated with cellular manufacturing are derived from tabour flexibility, it becomes necessary to extend the research to DRC systems. In this study, we assume several levels of tabour flexibility in all three systems, in addition to other relevant factors such as lot size, set-up reduction, and tabour assignment rules. It is shown that VCM can outperform efficiently operated FL and CL in certain parameter ranges, as preliminary research has shown so far. However, it is shown that CL tends to outperform both VCM and FL in the parameter ranges customarily advocated for CL, namely, low lot sizes, adequate levels of set-up reduction, cross training of workers, and worker mobility within cells.